Bianco says there is no legal basis for the Attorney General to stop the ballot investigation

Chad BiancoRiverside County Sheriff, then a candidate for governor of California

Defended or excused

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's statement at his office's election fraud investigation news conference, March 20, 2026.

Excerpt from 2:38 to 4:14 of the California government video. DI added its logo in the corner.

Video: Riverside County Sheriff's Office

Watch the full original video (opens in a new tab) (relevant passage: Statement at 02:41-02:57, 03:20-03:45 and 04:04-04:11)

At a March 20 news conference, Sheriff Chad Bianco said the Attorney General's office had asked him to halt the ballot investigation without giving a reason, that there was "no legal justification for the Attorney General to stop a lawful investigation", and that the investigation would continue under the court's jurisdiction. He described it as a physical count of the ballots compared with the reported vote total.

Responding to

The Attorney General has no legal authority to order a sheriff to halt or pause a lawful criminal investigation.

“I was contacted by a representative of Attorney General Bonta and asked to halt this investigation until after March 6th. No reason was provided and there is no legal justification for the Attorney General to stop a lawful investigation. … Under direction of the court and the court's jurisdiction over all evidence, this investigation will continue despite A.G. Bonta's attempts to stop it. A.G. Bonta is part of the executive branch of this state. Under the separation of powers principle, A.G. Bonta does not have authority over the court or evidence, and I will carry out my constitutional duty to pursue justice impartially. … This investigation is simple. Physically count the ballots and compare that result with the total votes reported.”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Election Fraud Investigation Press Conference (Riverside County Sheriff's Office, March 20, 2026) · Riverside County Sheriff's OfficeStatement at 02:41-02:57, 03:20-03:45 and 04:04-04:11

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco defends seizure of 656,000 ballots · The Press-EnterpriseReport on the March 20 news conference; statements by Bonta and Weber

Case updates

Updates on the Riverside ballot seizure after the court's ruling

Get notified if new court filings follow the California Supreme Court's ruling, Bianco takes further steps in his inquiry, or state officials respond.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Chad Bianco in this case

Every statement by Chad Bianco
Editorial composite of Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco beside the California Supreme Court opinion in the ballot-seizure case.
Credit: Riverside County Sheriff's Office; Supreme Court of California; composite by The Dispute Index

Where this statement fits

Was Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's seizure of about 650,000 ballots lawful?

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's department obtained search warrants in February and March 2026 and, on February 26, seized about 650,000 ballots from the November 2025 Proposition 50 special election from the county registrar of voters. Bianco said he was investigating a discrepancy of 45,896 ballots reported by a citizens' group; Registrar Art Tinoco said the reported gap reflected a misreading of preliminary records and that the actual variance was 103 ballots. Attorney General Rob Bonta directed Bianco on February 26 to preserve the materials and pause the investigation, and sued after Bianco said on March 20 that it would continue despite the Attorney General's attempts to stop it. On September 24, 2026, the California Supreme Court unanimously held in Cervantes v. Bianco that the seizure violated Elections Code section 15551(d) and ordered the ballots returned, and held in Bonta v. Bianco that the Attorney General may give a sheriff binding directions about an investigation. Bianco says the investigation was lawful and that he disagrees with the rulings, but has said he will obey the court's writs; the court did not resolve whether the claimed discrepancy exists.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original video

Election Fraud Investigation Press Conference (Riverside County Sheriff's Office, March 20, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · Riverside County Sheriff's OfficeStatement at 02:41-02:57, 03:20-03:45 and 04:04-04:11

About this source

Video of the March 20, 2026 news conference at which Sheriff Bianco publicly described the ballot investigation, said a court had ordered a special master, and responded to the Attorney General's directives to halt it.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Watch the clip from this source at the top of the page.

Reporting

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco defends seizure of 656,000 ballots (opens in a new tab) · The Press-EnterpriseReport on the March 20 news conference; statements by Bonta and Weber

About this source

Press-Enterprise report on the March 20 news conference, with responses from Attorney General Bonta's office and Secretary of State Weber.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Bianco opened the news conference by saying it was called to inform the public of the investigation, to discuss what he called interference by Attorney General Rob Bonta, and to assure residents that elections are secure. He described a 45,896-vote difference alleged by a citizens' group and said a judge had ordered a special master to oversee the count.

After the quotation

Attorney General Bonta's office responded the same day that there were serious questions about the merits of the investigation and legal deficiencies in the warrant affidavits, and Secretary of State Shirley Weber said her office had thus far found the allegations unsubstantiated. The California Supreme Court later said the March 19 warrant did not appoint a special master.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the sheriff's seizure and handling of the ballots. Bianco calls the investigation lawful and says the Attorney General has no authority to stop it, which defends both the seizure and his continuing after the Attorney General's directives.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Rob Bonta

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Chad Bianco, Bianco says there is no legal basis for the Attorney General to stop the ballot investigationDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Bianco says there is no legal basis for the Attorney General to stop the ballot investigation
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2417-at-a-march-20-news-conference-sheriff-chad

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Bianco says there is no legal basis for the Attorney General to stop the ballot investigation". First published: 2026-09-25. Last updated: 2026-09-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/2417-at-a-march-20-news-conference-sheriff-chad