Delaware Republican Party says no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”

Delaware Republican PartyState political party, in a statement on its official Facebook page

Defended or excused

In a Facebook post on September 22, the Delaware Republican Party said Delawareans “deserve a real debate,” not one that ends when a Republican nominee refuses to recite the other side’s talking points, and that it stands with the First Amendment. It said candidates should be able to speak and voters should be able to hear them, and that no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”. The post describes Arminio as removed after referring to McBride as male and says the moderator cited the event’s rules of decorum.

“Delawareans deserve a real debate, not a debate that ends the moment a Republican nominee refuses to recite the other side’s talking points. We stand with the First Amendment. Candidates should be able to speak, voters should be able to hear them, and no forum should substitute enforced language for open political argument.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Delaware Republican Party Facebook post on the September 17 forum removal · Delaware Republican PartyFull Facebook post, published September 22, 2026

Case updates

Watching the fallout from Arminio's removal from the forum?

Get an email if Arminio's candidacy changes, or if McBride, Katz, the forum organizers or Delaware Republicans say more about his removal.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Sarah McBride speaking at a lectern at a 2017 federal Pride Month event.
Credit: Donna Burton / U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Where this statement fits

Did Joe Arminio’s misgendering of Sarah McBride warrant his removal from a Delaware candidate forum?

On September 17, 2026, at a candidates forum at the Siegel Jewish Community Center in Wilmington, Joseph Arminio, the Republican nominee for Delaware’s at-large U.S. House seat, referred to his opponent, Rep. Sarah McBride, with male terms, including “his” in his opening statement, which the audience met with boos, and “gentlemen” later. McBride is the first openly transgender member of Congress. After the first instance the moderator, Ken Grant, told Arminio: “This is your final warning. If you fail to show respect to anyone else on this stage, you will be asked to leave.” Arminio said in a later answer that he had “committed an error.” After the second instance his microphone was cut and he was removed. McBride said on stage that she did not want Arminio to be unable to speak. Mike Katz, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, who was on the same stage, has said he called for Arminio’s removal, and afterward called on him to withdraw from the race. Grant later said the rule was applied “as they would have been for any candidate, of any party, on any subject.” Whether Arminio’s conduct warranted his removal from the forum, and whether it warrants his withdrawal from the race, is the matter in dispute. In his first public statement since the forum, issued September 22, Arminio said he appreciated McBride defending his freedom of speech and that he is “a firm supporter of freedom of speech and the Constitution in its entirety.”

Read the full case

Source and context

Original post

Delaware Republican Party Facebook post on the September 17 forum removal (opens in a new tab) · Delaware Republican PartyFull Facebook post, published September 22, 2026

About this source

Post on the Delaware Republican Party’s Facebook page that shares a Daily Caller report on the forum removal. It describes Arminio as removed “after referring to Rep. Sarah McBride as male” and says the moderator “cited the event’s rules of decorum.” The Delaware News Journal reports that this was the party’s statement on the incident, released September 22.

Before the quotation

The post shares a Daily Caller report on the forum. It states: “On September 17, Republican U.S. House nominee Joe Arminio was removed from a candidate forum after referring to Rep. Sarah McBride as male. The moderator cited the event’s rules of decorum and asked him to leave.”

After the quotation

The post came five days after the forum. It ends with a link to the party’s donation page.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to whether Arminio’s conduct warranted his removal from the forum, the party treats the removal as an improper limit on speech, saying no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”. That defends his conduct. The closest competing label, “Challenged the characterization”, loses because the post does more than dispute how the incident is described: it argues that the removal was wrong.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Delaware Republican Party, Delaware Republican Party says no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Delaware Republican Party says no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2169-in-a-facebook-post-on-september-22-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Delaware Republican Party says no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”". First published: 2026-09-24. Last updated: 2026-09-24. https://disputeindex.com/events/2169-in-a-facebook-post-on-september-22-the