Delaware Republican Party says no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”
Delaware Republican PartyState political party, in a statement on its official Facebook page
In a Facebook post on September 22, the Delaware Republican Party said Delawareans “deserve a real debate,” not one that ends when a Republican nominee refuses to recite the other side’s talking points, and that it stands with the First Amendment. It said candidates should be able to speak and voters should be able to hear them, and that no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”. The post describes Arminio as removed after referring to McBride as male and says the moderator cited the event’s rules of decorum.
“Delawareans deserve a real debate, not a debate that ends the moment a Republican nominee refuses to recite the other side’s talking points. We stand with the First Amendment. Candidates should be able to speak, voters should be able to hear them, and no forum should substitute enforced language for open political argument.”
Original post

Where this statement fits
Did Joe Arminio’s misgendering of Sarah McBride warrant his removal from a Delaware candidate forum?
On September 17, 2026, at a candidates forum at the Siegel Jewish Community Center in Wilmington, Joseph Arminio, the Republican nominee for Delaware’s at-large U.S. House seat, referred to his opponent, Rep. Sarah McBride, with male terms, including “his” in his opening statement, which the audience met with boos, and “gentlemen” later. McBride is the first openly transgender member of Congress. After the first instance the moderator, Ken Grant, told Arminio: “This is your final warning. If you fail to show respect to anyone else on this stage, you will be asked to leave.” Arminio said in a later answer that he had “committed an error.” After the second instance his microphone was cut and he was removed. McBride said on stage that she did not want Arminio to be unable to speak. Mike Katz, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, who was on the same stage, has said he called for Arminio’s removal, and afterward called on him to withdraw from the race. Grant later said the rule was applied “as they would have been for any candidate, of any party, on any subject.” Whether Arminio’s conduct warranted his removal from the forum, and whether it warrants his withdrawal from the race, is the matter in dispute. In his first public statement since the forum, issued September 22, Arminio said he appreciated McBride defending his freedom of speech and that he is “a firm supporter of freedom of speech and the Constitution in its entirety.”
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Post on the Delaware Republican Party’s Facebook page that shares a Daily Caller report on the forum removal. It describes Arminio as removed “after referring to Rep. Sarah McBride as male” and says the moderator “cited the event’s rules of decorum.” The Delaware News Journal reports that this was the party’s statement on the incident, released September 22.
Before the quotation
The post shares a Daily Caller report on the forum. It states: “On September 17, Republican U.S. House nominee Joe Arminio was removed from a candidate forum after referring to Rep. Sarah McBride as male. The moderator cited the event’s rules of decorum and asked him to leave.”
After the quotation
The post came five days after the forum. It ends with a link to the party’s donation page.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to whether Arminio’s conduct warranted his removal from the forum, the party treats the removal as an improper limit on speech, saying no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”. That defends his conduct. The closest competing label, “Challenged the characterization”, loses because the post does more than dispute how the incident is described: it argues that the removal was wrong.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseArminio invokes free speech in later response to the candidates-forum incident
“I myself am a firm supporter of freedom of speech and the Constitution in its entirety. That, of course, extends to one’s right to assert the “gender identity” of one’s choosing, as well as to assert the facts as one sees them.”Read statement
Nancy Mace calls Arminio’s removal “The Left policing biology and speech”
“The Left policing biology and speech...”Read statement
Earl Cooper says Arminio is “setting us back” as he launches a write-in campaign
“I am a man of color. I am an African American, and I felt like he’s setting us back … I see a lot of the people who back him. They are really kind of making it very clear that they are in line with him and I disagreed with that. So for that reason, I went today to give Delawareans a choice.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Delaware Republican Party says no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/2169-in-a-facebook-post-on-september-22-the
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Delaware Republican Party says no forum should “substitute enforced language for open political argument”". First published: 2026-09-24. Last updated: 2026-09-24. https://disputeindex.com/events/2169-in-a-facebook-post-on-september-22-the