Statement after voting against H.Con.Res. 93
Ashley HinsonU.S. Representative, Iowa's 2nd Congressional District; Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, Iowa
After voting against H.Con.Res. 93, Hinson said she wants Trump to bring the war to 'a successful end' immediately and called for 'a decisive and immediate victory,' pairing her call to end the war with support for harsher economic sanctions.
“Like all Americans I want this war to end — I believe President Trump should immediately bring this war to a successful end in a way that keeps Americans safe from the threat of a nuclear armed Iran. And I support the full court press economic sanctions to bring the Iranian terrorist regime to its knees. We owe it to our troops, their families and every American being squeezed by high prices to deliver a decisive and immediate victory in this war.”
Reporting
Other statements by Ashley Hinson in this case
- House vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 93 (Iran war powers)Earlier: Defended or excused
- Post linking Iowa costs to the Iran warLater: Mixed or conditional
Where this statement fits
Do they support the war in Iran?
An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 congressional candidates stand on continued U.S. military operations against Iran, based on their votes, campaign statements, and public remarks.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Des Moines Register report on Iowa Reps. Zach Nunn and Mariannette Miller-Meeks voting for H.Con.Res. 93 on September 15, 2026 after five previous votes against, with their full statements and statements from Ashley Hinson and Democratic challengers.
Before the quotation
On September 15, 2026, Hinson voted against H.Con.Res. 93, her sixth vote against curbing Trump's war powers, even as Iowa colleagues Nunn and Miller-Meeks broke ranks to support it.
After the quotation
Five days later Hinson posted that Iowans 'shouldn't have to foot the bill' for the war, drawing Josh Turek's response: 'It's easy to send a tweet but when you had the chance to vote to end this war, you chose not to.'
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Calls for an immediate end to the war but conditions it on 'victory,' votes against the measure that would end it, and pairs the call with escalation of economic pressure, which amounts to rhetorical opposition to continuation without support for ending it.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJen Mazzuckelli says she would vote for an Iran war powers resolution
“Yes, I would absolutely support and vote for a war powers resolution ... I also would work to get Congress to draft and pass legislation that would narrow and specify circumstances in which the President could initiate military action without Congressional approval.”Read statement
Carl Lambrecht says he supports the Iran war because Iran should not have a nuclear bomb
“Iran should not have a nuclear bomb. Therefore I support the war.”Read statement
Houston Brignano's campaign says he would vote against an Iran war powers resolution
“On a war powers resolution directing the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities against Iran: Houston would vote no.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Statement after voting against H.Con.Res. 93
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/1590-after-voting-against-h-con-res-93-hinson
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Statement after voting against H.Con.Res. 93". First published: 2026-09-24. Last updated: 2026-09-24. https://disputeindex.com/events/1590-after-voting-against-h-con-res-93-hinson