Patrick Kolasinski condemns the agents’ conduct as horrible training

Patrick KolasinskiAttorney for Carlos Iván Mendoza Hernández

Kolasinski said Mendoza Hernández tried to avoid the officers and condemned the agents’ training as horrible.

“He is doing everything he can to not run them over as they try their best to get in his way. If you look at that video and watch that video side by side with the Renee Good video, it’s the same training, and it’s horrible training. The California Highway Patrol does dangerous stops day in and day out. They don’t have this kind of issue.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)‘ICE got bad information’: Attorney disputes government claims made in Northern California ICE shootingLines 258–314; statements by Todd Lyons and Patrick Kolasinski
Dash-camera footage showing vehicles and officers during the traffic stop involving Carlos Iván Mendoza Hernández.
Credit: U.S. Department of Justice court filing

Where this statement fits

Were federal immigration officers justified in shooting Carlos Iván Mendoza Hernández?

On April 7, 2026, federal immigration officers shot Carlos Iván Mendoza Hernández several times during a vehicle stop near Interstate 5 in Patterson, California. An FBI affidavit says the four-person team included three ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations officers and one Customs and Border Protection officer. It alleges Mendoza Hernández moved forward and struck an agent, reversed into a government truck, and then accelerated toward two agents, causing them to fire in response to an immediate threat. His attorney said agents fired while the car was stopped and that Mendoza Hernández fled the gunfire in panic. Public dashcam footage shows parts of the vehicle's movement but has no audio and does not establish when the shots were fired. Mendoza Hernández was later indicted on assault and property-damage charges, which remained unresolved as of September 22, 2026. The dispute is whether the vehicle posed an imminent threat when officers fired.

Read the full case

Case updates

Stay with the Mendoza Hernández shooting and assault case

Get an email if Mendoza Hernández's assault case goes to trial or is resolved, or if new evidence shows when officers fired.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Reporting

‘ICE got bad information’: Attorney disputes government claims made in Northern California ICE shooting (opens in a new tab)Lines 258–314; statements by Todd Lyons and Patrick Kolasinski

About this source

The report presents the government’s justification, Kolasinski’s response and the available dashcam footage after the Patterson shooting.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Kolasinski responded to Lyons’s claim that Mendoza Hernández used his vehicle as a weapon.

After the quotation

He contrasted the operation with dangerous traffic stops conducted by the California Highway Patrol.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the officers’ decision to fire, Kolasinski expressly criticizes the conduct and training while arguing that Mendoza Hernández tried to avoid hitting officers.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Patrick Kolasinski condemns the agents’ conduct as horrible training
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1469-kolasinski-said-mendoza-hern%C3%A1ndez-tried-to-avoid-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Patrick Kolasinski condemns the agents’ conduct as horrible training". First published: 2026-09-22. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1469-kolasinski-said-mendoza-hern%C3%A1ndez-tried-to-avoid-the