Aaron Reitz declines to draw a final conclusion on the shooting
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas
“I want to reiterate: This assessment is based on preliminary information given to my office. We draw no decisive conclusions and believe federal law enforcement will conduct a thorough investigation.”
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Official preliminary federal reconstruction. Reitz expressly reserved judgment and said the account was not a final conclusion.
Before the quotation
Reitz described preliminary information indicating that the van shifted from reverse to forward while an officer was partly inside or immediately beside it and that an officer then fired one shot.
After the quotation
He said his office was seeking the truth and urged the public to give the FBI and DHS an opportunity to complete their investigations.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Was ICE justified in fatally shooting Lorenzo Salgado Araujo?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to whether the fatal use of force was justified, Reitz expressly states that his office draws no decisive conclusion. His preliminary reconstruction supplies context but does not replace that explicit refusal to reach a final judgment.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Was ICE justified in fatally shooting Lorenzo Salgado Araujo?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“That is because the President of the United States, Donald John Trump, is covering up unjustified killings of civilians, including Renee Good, Alex Pretti, Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, and Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero.”Read statement
“This is an outrageous abuse of government power. ICE pursued the wrong van and killed an unarmed man who wasn’t their target.”Read statement
“Lorenzo Salgado Araujo should still be alive today, and nothing about the government's so-called 'search' could have changed that fact. By taking the unusual steps of securing and then unsealing their search warrant, the government has demonstrated that it is more interested in creating a false narrative than in seeking the truth.”Read statement