Brett Smiley vetoes Providence's rent stabilization ordinance

Mayor of Providence, explaining his veto in a signed letter to the council president.

In Providence, this ordinance would also shift the tax burden onto single-family homeowners...
Open source (opens in a new tab)Ocean State Media reports Smiley's rent-control veto and rationaleOpening account of the April 17 veto; following paragraphs summarizing and quoting Smiley's signed letter to the council president.
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Providence City Council explains the rent proposal and its veto statusOpening disclaimer; 4% Standard Increase, Fair Rate of Return and Exemptions sections.

Source and context

Reporting

Ocean State Media reports Smiley's rent-control veto and rationale (opens in a new tab)Opening account of the April 17 veto; following paragraphs summarizing and quoting Smiley's signed letter to the council president.

About this source

Reports the veto and Smiley's argument that rent regulation would discourage construction and shift taxes onto homeowners. It also describes exceptions and proposed eviction assistance. Those predicted effects are attributed to Smiley.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Providence City Council explains the rent proposal and its veto status (opens in a new tab)Opening disclaimer; 4% Standard Increase, Fair Rate of Return and Exemptions sections.

About this source

The council's public explanation records passage on April 16, 2026, the mayor's veto on April 17 and the unsuccessful override. Its arguments for the proposal are presented by supporters on the council and do not represent every councilor.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The council passed the ordinance on April 16. Smiley had opposed the proposal before vetoing it on April 17.

After the quotation

His letter also argued that rent regulation would discourage construction. The council subsequently attempted to override his veto but did not secure enough votes.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Responding to: Providence's proposed rent stabilization ordinance would constrain housing supply and shift the tax burden onto single-family homeowners.

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to adopting the proposed 4% rent-cap framework, Smiley rejects it through his veto and argues against its expected effects. His opposition addresses the policy itself.

Recorded on
Published here
Three-story Ontario Apartments building in Providence, Rhode Island.
Credit: Kenneth C. Zirkel

Should Providence cap annual rent increases at 4%?

Explore the case context, sources and public responses.

Read the full case

More from this case

Read the full case

David Morales

In January, I intend to work with the city council when they reintroduce the rent stabilization ordinance.
Read statement

Brett Smiley

I do believe it will make things worse and not better in Providence for home affordability.
Read statement

David Morales

After years of community organizing, the Providence City Council has passed Rent Stabilization!
Read statement