Ron Filipkowski says Trump negotiated "for things we already had in Greenland"
Editor-in-chief of MeidasTouch News, posting on his own Bluesky account
“Trump did an incredible job negotiating for things we already had in Greenland.”
Source and context
Original post
About this source
The speaker's own post, read verbatim from the Bluesky public API (app.bsky.feed.getPostThread) and the bsky.app page's og:description. It is a standalone one-sentence text post with no quoted post, link or image. It does not name the agreement, so its link to the 2026-09-18 announcement rests on timing (3 hours 52 minutes after Trump's Truth Social post), on its wording, and on its being the only Greenland post among his 94 most recent posts (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-19 02:16 UTC); replies and quote-posts by other users read it as about the agreement. The same sentence appears on his Threads account (@ronaldfilipkowski), read through a page reader. publicationDate is the US Eastern date; the UTC date is 2026-09-19. No archived copy exists (Wayback CDX returned no capture; capturing needs Internet Archive keys).
Before the quotation
At 5:18 PM EDT on 2026-09-18, Trump posted on Truth Social that the United States had entered into an agreement with Denmark and Greenland that gives it "permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland."
After the quotation
The post was published nearly four hours after Trump's announcement.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Trump’s “permanent control” description of the announced U.S.-Denmark-Greenland security agreement
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case's fixed reference point is Trump's Truth Social post of 2026-09-18 describing the not-yet-signed, unpublished agreement as giving the United States permanent control over security and all other needs in Greenland. Filipkowski's own words say the negotiation was "for things we already had in Greenland", which disputes that description by treating the agreement as restating what the U.S. already held; "an incredible job" is sarcastic and is not praise of the agreement. The closest competing label is minimizes, because "already had" also downplays how much the agreement adds. That loses because he disputes what the agreement adds rather than conceding a concern and shrinking it, and he does not criticize the agreement itself.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Donald Trump
Trump’s “permanent control” description of the announced U.S.-Denmark-Greenland security agreement
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“I'm looking forward to the ink being dry on the new agreement with the USA. And to us being able to see the content. Until then, I'm skeptical. I don't have much confidence in Trump.”Read statement
“We will have to wait with that until the agreement is published next week. So I don't have many comments on that.”Read statement
“Next week could be a good week… For Greenland, Denmark and the USA alike. Where a long period of uncertainty is hopefully replaced by a binding agreement that strengthens security in the Arctic and the North Atlantic and thus also our shared security in NATO and Europe - with respect for the Kingdom's red lines.”Read statement