CAIR-Philadelphia says Palestinian advocacy should not be grounds for exclusion from a publicly owned venue

CAIR-PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, in an open letter and supporter campaign it sponsored

CAIR-Philadelphia published an open letter and supporter campaign addressed to the Philadelphia Eagles, Eagles Stadium Operator LLC, the Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, the City of Philadelphia and Lincoln Financial Group, asking who decided that Macklemore would not perform at the September 19 Ed Sheeran concert at Lincoln Financial Field. The letter frames his removal, which followed his public expressions of solidarity with Palestinians, as a question of free expression and public accountability at a venue on publicly owned land.

“This is about more than one artist or one concert. It raises serious questions about free expression, public accountability, and whether advocacy for Palestinian human rights can become grounds for exclusion from a major venue operating on publicly owned property.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Philadelphia Deserves Answers: Who Decided Macklemore Could Not Perform at Lincoln Financial Field? · CAIR-PhiladelphiaOpen letter and letter-writing campaign page sponsored by CAIR-Philadelphia, addressed to the Philadelphia Eagles, Eagles Stadium Operator LLC, the Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, the City of Philadelphia and Lincoln Financial Group.
Macklemore performing onstage at Hovefestivalen in 2013

Where this statement fits

Macklemore’s “Free Palestine” speech and removal from Ed Sheeran’s U.S. tour

At two Ed Sheeran concerts at MetLife Stadium, Macklemore called for a free Palestine, accused Israel of apartheid and genocide, and said criticism of Israel was not criticism of Jewish people. After venue objections, tour promoter Messina Touring Group said he would not perform the remaining U.S. Loop Tour dates. Critics characterized the performance as hostile or inappropriate; Macklemore defended it as a call for equal treatment.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want updates on Macklemore's removal from Ed Sheeran's tour?

We'll email you if the other stadium owners named in the Kraft reports respond, or if Macklemore, Sheeran or the tour promoter says more about the removal.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Philadelphia Deserves Answers: Who Decided Macklemore Could Not Perform at Lincoln Financial Field? (opens in a new tab) · CAIR-PhiladelphiaOpen letter and letter-writing campaign page sponsored by CAIR-Philadelphia, addressed to the Philadelphia Eagles, Eagles Stadium Operator LLC, the Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, the City of Philadelphia and Lincoln Financial Group.

About this source

The organisation's own campaign page, carrying the template letter supporters send under their own names. The letter seeks disclosure of who decided that Macklemore would not perform at the September 19 Lincoln Financial Field concert and raises the venue's location on publicly owned property.

Before the quotation

The Philly Palestine Coalition and Shut Down D&Z had announced a protest outside Lincoln Financial Field the previous day. Philadelphia police were preparing for the September 19 concert, the first of Sheeran's U.S. dates since Macklemore's removal.

After the quotation

Neither the Eagles, the stadium operator nor the city had publicly identified who made the decision.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

CAIR-Philadelphia treats the speech as protected advocacy that should not cost an artist a booking, which defends the conduct under scrutiny. The closest competing label is “Explicitly stayed out”, because the letter is framed as a request for information rather than a verdict and does not say in terms that the removal was wrong. That loses because the letter's own framing supplies the position: it characterises the removal as raising "serious questions about free expression" and asks whether Palestinian advocacy can be grounds for exclusion, which presupposes that it should not be.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Macklemore

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: CAIR-Philadelphia, CAIR-Philadelphia says Palestinian advocacy should not be grounds for exclusion from a publicly owned venueDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
CAIR-Philadelphia says Palestinian advocacy should not be grounds for exclusion from a publicly owned venue
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1047-cair-philadelphia-published-an-open-letter-and-supporter

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "CAIR-Philadelphia says Palestinian advocacy should not be grounds for exclusion from a publicly owned venue". First published: 2026-09-18. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/1047-cair-philadelphia-published-an-open-letter-and-supporter