Dr. Jamila Perritt answers Hawley's "the science is clear" with the same phrase

Obstetrician-gynecologist and president and chief executive of Physicians for Reproductive Health, in an organisational press release

the science is clear: mifepristone is safe, mifepristone is effective, and mifepristone is still medically indicated
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Senate Introduces Attack on Mifepristone · Physicians for Reproductive HealthOrganizational press release, March 12, 2026, carrying a statement attributed to president and chief executive Dr. Jamila Perritt.

Source and context

Official statement

Senate Introduces Attack on Mifepristone (opens in a new tab) · Physicians for Reproductive HealthOrganizational press release, March 12, 2026, carrying a statement attributed to president and chief executive Dr. Jamila Perritt.

About this source

The response from a national physicians' organization, answering Hawley's safety claim on clinical grounds. Perritt's phrasing deliberately mirrors Hawley's own "the science is clear" formulation from the bill announcement.

Before the quotation

Hawley had said the previous day that "the science is clear: the chemical abortion drug is inherently dangerous to women and prone to abuse."

After the quotation

PolitiFact later reported that more than 100 peer-reviewed studies support the FDA's assessment that serious complications occur in under 0.5 percent of cases.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Congress ban the abortion pill, mifepristone, as Josh Hawley has proposed?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case's fixed reference point is Hawley's proposition that Congress should ban mifepristone by revoking its federal approval. Perritt rejects the clinical premise the ban rests on, in a statement her organisation issued expressly as a response to the bill. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because on its face the sentence disputes a factual claim about the drug rather than addressing the legislation. That loses because the premise she rejects is the bill's sole stated justification, and the statement was issued as an objection to the bill; treating it as a narrow factual quarrel would understate a physicians' organisation's rejection of the proposal.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Josh Hawley

More from this case

Read the full case

Tony Perkins

Unfortunately the Republican Party has lost its voice on the life issue and in that vacuum there are leaders that are stepping forward like Sen. Hawley calling upon the church, communities and the country to step up on behalf of the unborn.
Read statement

Josh Hawley

This Declaration for Life, written by pastors, is calling on everyday Christians across America to stand for life and confront the scourge of chemical abortion.
Read statement

Jon Husted

Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), who faces a competitive reelection race, told Axios he hasn't seen Hawley's bill when asked for his position on it.
Read statement