Dr. Jamila Perritt answers Hawley's "the science is clear" with the same phrase

Jamila PerrittObstetrician-gynecologist and president and chief executive of Physicians for Reproductive Health, in an organisational press release

Condemned

Dr. Jamila Perritt, an obstetrician-gynecologist and president of Physicians for Reproductive Health, responded to Hawley's bill by stating that the scientific evidence establishes mifepristone as safe, effective and still medically indicated, using the same "the science is clear" construction Hawley had used to argue the opposite.

“the science is clear: mifepristone is safe, mifepristone is effective, and mifepristone is still medically indicated”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Senate Introduces Attack on Mifepristone · Physicians for Reproductive HealthOrganizational press release, March 12, 2026, carrying a statement attributed to president and chief executive Dr. Jamila Perritt.

Case updates

Tracking Josh Hawley's push to ban the abortion pill

Get an email if the mifepristone bill moves in committee or gains cosponsors, or if candidates sign or reject Hawley's Declaration for Life pledge.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Conceptual image of generic white tablets in a blister pack beneath a shadow resembling the U.S. Capitol.
Credit: The Dispute Index / AI-generated illustration

Where this statement fits

Should Congress ban the abortion pill, mifepristone, as Josh Hawley has proposed?

On March 11, 2026, Senator Josh Hawley introduced the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act, which would withdraw the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone for pregnancy termination, make distributing and labeling the drug for that purpose violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, and let women who say chemical abortion harmed them sue its manufacturers. Mifepristone has been approved in the United States since 2000 and is used in a large majority of American abortions. Hawley argues a national ban is the only remedy because the drug can be mailed into states whose own laws restrict abortion. The bill drew seven Republican cosponsors but has not moved out of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. On September 16, 2026, Hawley unveiled a four-page "Declaration for Life" and began asking officeholders and candidates to sign it as a commitment to ban the drug. The dispute is over whether Congress should enact that ban.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Senate Introduces Attack on Mifepristone (opens in a new tab) · Physicians for Reproductive HealthOrganizational press release, March 12, 2026, carrying a statement attributed to president and chief executive Dr. Jamila Perritt.

About this source

The response from a national physicians' organization, answering Hawley's safety claim on clinical grounds. Perritt's phrasing deliberately mirrors Hawley's own "the science is clear" formulation from the bill announcement.

Before the quotation

Hawley had said the previous day that "the science is clear: the chemical abortion drug is inherently dangerous to women and prone to abuse."

After the quotation

PolitiFact later reported that more than 100 peer-reviewed studies support the FDA's assessment that serious complications occur in under 0.5 percent of cases.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Perritt rejects the clinical premise the ban rests on, in a statement her organisation issued expressly as a response to the bill. The closest competing label is “Challenged the characterization”, because on its face the sentence disputes a factual claim about the drug rather than addressing the legislation. That loses because the premise she rejects is the bill's sole stated justification, and the statement was issued as an objection to the bill; treating it as a narrow factual quarrel would understate a physicians' organisation's rejection of the proposal.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Josh Hawley

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Jamila Perritt, Dr. Jamila Perritt answers Hawley's "the science is clear" with the same phraseDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Dr. Jamila Perritt answers Hawley's "the science is clear" with the same phrase
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1037-dr-jamila-perritt-an-obstetrician-gynecologist-and-president

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Dr. Jamila Perritt answers Hawley's "the science is clear" with the same phrase". First published: 2026-09-18. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1037-dr-jamila-perritt-an-obstetrician-gynecologist-and-president