Alexis McGill Johnson says the bill spreads misinformation about a safe and effective medication

President and chief executive of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, in a statement reported by MS NOW

This is yet another effort from abortion opponents to restrict access to care and spread even more misinformation about a safe and effective medication that millions of people have used.
Open source (opens in a new tab)Anti-abortion groups to GOP: Act on mifepristone or pay in the midterms · MS NOWMS NOW, March 13, 2026. Report on the Republican and anti-abortion movement response to the Hawley bill.

Source and context

Reporting

Anti-abortion groups to GOP: Act on mifepristone or pay in the midterms (opens in a new tab) · MS NOWMS NOW, March 13, 2026. Report on the Republican and anti-abortion movement response to the Hawley bill.

About this source

Source for Bill Cassidy's response as chairman of the committee holding the bill, John Cornyn's "All in" post on X, Chuck Schumer's reaction, and Alexis McGill Johnson's statement. Also records that spokespeople for Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski did not respond to questions about the bill, and that the two were the only Republican senators who declined to sign a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services calling for a mifepristone crackdown.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Mifepristone has been approved in the United States since 2000 and the FDA has said it has identified no new safety concerns with the drug.

After the quotation

Hawley's asserted complication rate was drawn from a non-peer-reviewed paper that more than 250 reproductive health researchers criticised.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Congress ban the abortion pill, mifepristone, as Josh Hawley has proposed?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case's fixed reference point is Hawley's proposition that Congress should ban mifepristone by revoking its federal approval. McGill Johnson rejects the proposition and its evidentiary basis together. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, since much of the sentence contests Hawley's factual account of the drug's safety. That loses because the passage also condemns the legislative effort itself as a restriction on care, which is a substantive rejection of the conduct under scrutiny and not merely a dispute about how the drug is described.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Josh Hawley

More from this case

Read the full case

Tony Perkins

Unfortunately the Republican Party has lost its voice on the life issue and in that vacuum there are leaders that are stepping forward like Sen. Hawley calling upon the church, communities and the country to step up on behalf of the unborn.
Read statement

Josh Hawley

This Declaration for Life, written by pastors, is calling on everyday Christians across America to stand for life and confront the scourge of chemical abortion.
Read statement

Jon Husted

Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), who faces a competitive reelection race, told Axios he hasn't seen Hawley's bill when asked for his position on it.
Read statement