Chuck Schumer calls the mifepristone ban "inconceivably cruel and radical"

Senate Minority Leader and United States Senator for New York, in a statement to MS NOW

inconceivably cruel and radical
Open source (opens in a new tab)Anti-abortion groups to GOP: Act on mifepristone or pay in the midterms · MS NOWMS NOW, March 13, 2026. Report on the Republican and anti-abortion movement response to the Hawley bill.

Source and context

Reporting

Anti-abortion groups to GOP: Act on mifepristone or pay in the midterms (opens in a new tab) · MS NOWMS NOW, March 13, 2026. Report on the Republican and anti-abortion movement response to the Hawley bill.

About this source

Source for Bill Cassidy's response as chairman of the committee holding the bill, John Cornyn's "All in" post on X, Chuck Schumer's reaction, and Alexis McGill Johnson's statement. Also records that spokespeople for Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski did not respond to questions about the bill, and that the two were the only Republican senators who declined to sign a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services calling for a mifepristone crackdown.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The bill had been introduced two days earlier and would need Democratic votes to advance in the Senate, which Axios reported it would not get.

After the quotation

MS NOW reported the same week that anti-abortion groups were pressing Republican leadership to take the bill up regardless of its prospects.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Congress ban the abortion pill, mifepristone, as Josh Hawley has proposed?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case's fixed reference point is Hawley's proposition that Congress should ban mifepristone by revoking its federal approval. Schumer's words are directed at that bill and reject it in the strongest terms. The closest competing label is minimizes, in the sense that dismissing a proposal as radical can work to place it outside serious debate rather than to argue against it. That loses because the characterisation is plainly condemnatory rather than a downplaying of anyone's concern, and it is addressed squarely at the legislation under scrutiny.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Josh Hawley

More from this case

Read the full case

Tony Perkins

Unfortunately the Republican Party has lost its voice on the life issue and in that vacuum there are leaders that are stepping forward like Sen. Hawley calling upon the church, communities and the country to step up on behalf of the unborn.
Read statement

Josh Hawley

This Declaration for Life, written by pastors, is calling on everyday Christians across America to stand for life and confront the scourge of chemical abortion.
Read statement

Jon Husted

Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), who faces a competitive reelection race, told Axios he hasn't seen Hawley's bill when asked for his position on it.
Read statement