Hawley says "the science is clear" that the abortion drug is dangerous as he introduces a national ban
United States Senator for Missouri, in an official press release announcing his own legislation
“The science is clear: the chemical abortion drug is inherently dangerous to women and prone to abuse.”
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Hawley's own announcement of the bill, issued alongside a Capitol Hill press conference with anti-abortion movement leaders. It states the bill's three operative provisions and carries the quotation on which his safety claim rests.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Original text
About this source
The bill at issue in this case. It would withdraw the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone for pregnancy termination, make distributing and labeling the drug for that purpose violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, and create a private right of action for women who say chemical abortion harmed them to sue manufacturers. Legislative status and the cosponsor roster were verified against the GovTrack API (bill 428713) on September 18, 2026, because congress.gov blocked automated retrieval: seven Republican cosponsors, none withdrawn, the most recent joining June 23, 2026, and no action beyond committee referral. The identical House companion is H.R. 7902, introduced by Rep. Diana Harshbarger on March 12, 2026.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Hawley had spent the previous year pressing the Food and Drug Administration to review mifepristone's safety and had grown frustrated with the pace of that review. He announced the bill at a Capitol Hill press conference alongside anti-abortion movement leaders.
After the quotation
The safety claim rests on a 2025 Ethics and Public Policy Center paper that was not peer reviewed and was criticised by more than 250 reproductive health researchers. The bill was referred to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, where it has not moved.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Congress ban the abortion pill, mifepristone, as Josh Hawley has proposed?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case's fixed reference point is Hawley's proposition that Congress should ban mifepristone by revoking its federal approval. As the bill's author he advances that proposition directly, grounding it in an asserted safety finding. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because the statement is framed as a factual correction to the FDA's assessment of the drug. That loses because the sentence is not confined to disputing a description: it is the stated justification for legislation he simultaneously introduced to enact the ban, which is a substantive endorsement of the conduct under scrutiny rather than a quarrel about labels.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Congress ban the abortion pill, mifepristone, as Josh Hawley has proposed?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Unfortunately the Republican Party has lost its voice on the life issue and in that vacuum there are leaders that are stepping forward like Sen. Hawley calling upon the church, communities and the country to step up on behalf of the unborn.”Read statement
“This Declaration for Life, written by pastors, is calling on everyday Christians across America to stand for life and confront the scourge of chemical abortion.”Read statement
“Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), who faces a competitive reelection race, told Axios he hasn't seen Hawley's bill when asked for his position on it.”Read statement