Woodland police challenge DHS's account of the Antonio Moreida collision
Woodland police say video shows an ICE vehicle struck Antonio Moreida and is inconsistent with DHS's account that he jumped onto its hood. ICE later says its officers tried to drive around him. Lawmakers criticize ICE as the investigation continues.

Case period:
Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated
Overview
Woodland police say video their investigators reviewed shows Antonio Moreida was struck by a vehicle driven by an ICE agent, contrary to DHS's statement that he jumped onto the hood and slid off. ICE later said its officers tried to drive around him while braking. Lawmakers criticize ICE's conduct and the federal account.
Read the full background
Woodland police say officers responded at 9:38 a.m. on October 20 to a reported collision between a federal vehicle and a pedestrian near Clover Street and College Street. The department's first statement that day said ICE personnel were operating the vehicle, a Chevrolet Tahoe, during an operation in the area, and that the driver notified dispatch and cooperated with investigators. Police said the man, identified in news reports as Antonio Moreida, was evaluated at the scene and taken to a hospital. Moreida, a volunteer with the immigrant advocacy group NorCal Resist, told CBS News Sacramento he went to the neighborhood to document the operation and alert nearby residents.
On the morning of October 21, DHS sent news outlets a statement saying ICE did not hit a pedestrian and that the man jumped onto the hood, the driver braked and the man slid off. Later that day, Woodland police said certain claims in the DHS statement were inconsistent with video its investigators had obtained and reviewed. Based on that video, police said the pedestrian was struck by the vehicle and did not jump onto or slide off the hood, and that the driver applied the brakes before the collision. On October 22, ICE said the man stood in the middle of an active road and that its officers tried to drive around him while braking.
Police told KCRA on October 23 that the agent did not remain at the immediate location of the collision but stayed in the vicinity, reported it to dispatch and cooperated with officers, and that the collision was not being investigated as a hit-and-run. The department says its criminal investigation covers the actions of those involved and the events leading up to the collision, and that the investigation will go to the Yolo County District Attorney's Office for review when it is complete.
CBS News Sacramento reported that footage Moreida recorded shows the front of the vehicle striking him as he recorded in the street, and that home camera footage it reviewed corroborates the police account. Police say investigators also obtained video from several angles, including the interaction between the pedestrian and federal personnel in the minutes before the collision. We could not locate a public release of the footage of the minutes before the collision, and we could not review the complete recordings.
Timeline
2 timeline entries on this page. Dates: October 20, 2026 to October 22, 2026
October 2026
Woodland police investigate a collision between an ICE vehicle and Antonio Moreida
Incident
Police say an ICE-operated Chevrolet Tahoe and a pedestrian collided near Clover Street and College Street at 9:38 a.m. The driver notified dispatch, and police opened their own investigation.
[01]Woodland Police Department
The department says officers responded at 9:38 a.m. to a reported collision between a federal vehicle and a pedestrian near Clover Street and College Street. It says ICE personnel were operating the vehicle, a Chevrolet Tahoe, and that the driver notified dispatch and cooperated. Investigators were reviewing video from several angles, including the minutes before the collision.
Woodland Police Department's first statement on the October 20 collision · Woodland Police DepartmentRelease dated October 20, 2026[02]ICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its description
CBS News Sacramento reporting preserves the different October 21 DHS and October 22 ICE accounts. It reports an ongoing police investigation.
ICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its descriptionOpening ICE statement and later reproduction of the initial DHS statementICE issues a different explanation after the police rebuttal
Reaction
ICE says the man stood in the middle of an active road and that its officers tried to drive around him while braking. The statement does not repeat DHS's claim that he jumped onto the hood.
[02]ICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its description
CBS News Sacramento reporting preserves the different October 21 DHS and October 22 ICE accounts. It reports an ongoing police investigation.
ICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its descriptionOpening ICE statement and later reproduction of the initial DHS statement[03]ICE's October 22 statement and a police answer on the hit-and-run question
KCRA reports ICE's October 22 statement and the earlier DHS statement. It quotes an October 23 police answer saying the agent did not remain at the immediate location of the collision but stayed in the vicinity, and that the collision was not being investigated as a hit-and-run.
ICE's October 22 statement and a police answer on the hit-and-run questionICE statement, then police response of October 23
Response record
Responses
Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.
3 matching responses. Newest first.
U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementFederal agency speaking through its statementDirectly involvedBefore this statement
ICE gave the statement to news outlets on October 22, after Woodland police disputed DHS's first account. It opens by saying the man chose to impede a law enforcement action and stand in the middle of an active road.
"Our officers deliberately attempted to avoid making contact"
Defended or excusedCase context: Woodland police challenge DHS's account of the Antonio Moreida collision
Full statement and sources
ICE says the man chose to impede a law enforcement action and stood in the middle of an active road, and that its officers tried to drive around him while braking.
After the statement
The statement urges people not to stand in active roadways as a law enforcement vehicle approaches. It does not repeat or withdraw DHS's earlier claim that the man jumped onto the hood.
ICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its descriptionOpening ICE statement and later reproduction of the initial DHS statementICE's October 22 statement and a police answer on the hit-and-run questionICE statement, then police response of October 23Why this label?
The case concerns the ICE vehicle collision with Moreida and the federal account of it. ICE defends its officers by saying they tried to avoid him and by placing responsibility on his position in the road.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityFederal department, in a statement sent to news outletsDirectly involvedBefore this statement
DHS sent the statement to news outlets on the morning of October 21, the day after the collision. The department denies that ICE hit a pedestrian.
"An agitator jumped onto the hood of an ICE vehicle and the officer driving applied the brakes. The agitator slid off the hood."
Defended or excusedCase context: Woodland police challenge DHS's account of the Antonio Moreida collision
Full statement and sources
DHS denies that ICE hit a pedestrian and says the man jumped onto the vehicle's hood and slid off.
After the statement
The statement also says ICE contacted EMS and Woodland police. It accuses the man of flopping for the camera and says anyone who obstructs officers commits a federal crime. Woodland police disputed the jumping and sliding claims later that day.
DHS's October 21 statement on the Woodland collision, as published by ABC10Version updated October 21, 10:20 a.m. PDT; DHS statement at the endICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its descriptionOpening ICE statement and later reproduction of the initial DHS statementWhy this label?
The case concerns the ICE vehicle collision with Moreida and the federal account of it. DHS defends the agent by denying that ICE hit a pedestrian and saying the man jumped onto the hood and slid off.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Woodland Police DepartmentMunicipal police department reporting its findings to dateDirectly involved Before this statement
In an October 21 update, the department says certain claims in DHS's statement are inconsistent with video its investigators obtained and reviewed. Its first finding is that the pedestrian was struck by a vehicle driven by an ICE agent.
"The pedestrian did not jump onto the hood of the vehicle."
DeniedCase context: Woodland police challenge DHS's account of the Antonio Moreida collision
Full statement and sources
Woodland police say video reviewed so far shows the pedestrian did not jump onto the ICE vehicle's hood, one of the DHS claims they call inconsistent with the footage.
After the statement
The department also says the pedestrian did not slide off the hood, the driver applied the brakes before the collision, and the driver remained near the scene and contacted dispatch. It says the findings may be supplemented as more information is obtained.
Woodland Police Department update disputing parts of DHS's statement · Woodland Police DepartmentEnglish release and findings list, followed by the mayor's statementWoodland police chief gives findings from the ICE vehicle collision investigationRyan Kinnan response and five findingsICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its descriptionOpening ICE statement and later reproduction of the initial DHS statementWhy this label?
The case concerns the ICE vehicle collision with Moreida and the federal account of it. Police explicitly reject DHS's claim that the pedestrian jumped onto the hood.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Sources
(8)
Original post
Woodland Police Department update disputing parts of DHS's statement
Relevant passage: English release and findings list, followed by the mayor's statement
About this source
The department says certain claims in DHS's statement are inconsistent with video its investigators obtained and reviewed, and lists its findings to date. It says its criminal investigation covers the actions of those involved and the events leading up to the collision. The post includes a statement from Mayor Tom Stallard and a Spanish version.
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
ICE's October 22 statement and a police answer on the hit-and-run question
Relevant passage: ICE statement, then police response of October 23
About this source
KCRA reports ICE's October 22 statement and the earlier DHS statement. It quotes an October 23 police answer saying the agent did not remain at the immediate location of the collision but stayed in the vicinity, and that the collision was not being investigated as a hit-and-run.
- Author
- Jeremiah Martinez
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
DHS's October 21 statement on the Woodland collision, as published by ABC10
Relevant passage: Version updated October 21, 10:20 a.m. PDT; DHS statement at the end
About this source
ABC10 publishes the full statement DHS sent the station on the morning of October 21. DHS says ICE did not hit a pedestrian and that the man jumped onto the hood and slid off. The article also summarizes the police department's first statement.
- Author
- ABC10 staff
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Woodland Police Department's first statement on the October 20 collision
Relevant passage: Release dated October 20, 2026
About this source
The department says officers responded at 9:38 a.m. to a reported collision between a federal vehicle and a pedestrian near Clover Street and College Street. It says ICE personnel were operating the vehicle, a Chevrolet Tahoe, and that the driver notified dispatch and cooperated. Investigators were reviewing video from several angles, including the minutes before the collision.
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Adam Schiff criticizes ICE's account of the Moreida collision
About this source
Schiff criticizes ICE and DHS leadership over the collision and the initial description.
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Woodland police chief gives findings from the ICE vehicle collision investigation
Relevant passage: Ryan Kinnan response and five findings
About this source
The police chief says the pedestrian did not jump or slide from the hood, and says the driver braked, stayed nearby and cooperated initially.
- Author
- Sierra Krug
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
ICE provides a revised account after Woodland police dispute its description
Relevant passage: Opening ICE statement and later reproduction of the initial DHS statement
About this source
CBS News Sacramento reporting preserves the different October 21 DHS and October 22 ICE accounts. It reports an ongoing police investigation.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Mike Thompson responds to reports of an ICE vehicle striking a pedestrian
Relevant passage: Statement beginning ICE cannot continue
About this source
Thompson criticizes ICE after reports of the collision and says local authorities are investigating.
- Published
- Accessed
Share or embed this case
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Woodland police challenge DHS's account of the Antonio Moreida collision
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/cases/woodland-antonio-moreida-ice-vehicle-dhs-police-account
The Dispute Index. "Woodland police challenge DHS's account of the Antonio Moreida collision". First published: 2026-10-25. Last updated: 2026-10-25. https://disputeindex.com/cases/woodland-antonio-moreida-ice-vehicle-dhs-police-account