Steve Wynn
Role at the time: Casino developer and plaintiff
Condemned
Statement summary
Wynn joins the Rosses' legal challenge, including their argument that lawmakers cannot exclude property-tax receipts from the constitutional tax-limit calculation by changing the label.
“Article 30-C is therefore unconstitutional to the extent it purports to exclude PAT Tax revenues from the amount raised by tax on real estate for purposes of Article VIII, § 10(e).”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Ross v. New York: complaint challenging the pied-a-terre taxSuffolk index 628629/2026, NYSCEF document 2; paragraphs 1-19, 72-82 and 119-220; prayer for relief, page 39.
Joint pleading alleging unconstitutional discrimination and improper treatment of tax receipts. The plaintiffs' allegations and requested declarations are not a court judgment.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Why we used this label
He seeks judicial invalidation of the tax and its treatment of receipts.