Shmuley Boteach
Role at the time: Defendant acting through litigation counsel
Condemned
Statement summary
Boteach asks the court to sustain his objections to the proposed AI-provider subpoenas as drafted.
“The Court should sustain the objections to the proposed AI-provider subpoenas as drafted”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Boteach supplemental memorandum opposing the scope of AI discovery · Shmuley BoteachECF 282, pages 1-9
The defense challenges the scope of reopened damages discovery and seeks protection for qualifying litigation-preparation material.
Why we used this label
The case concerns the hotel's discovery requests. Boteach expressly rejects the subpoenas as drafted and asks the court to sustain his objections.