Catherine Rampell on Election Promises and Public Spending

Statements and actions by Catherine Rampell on this topic.

Disputes over campaign promises to provide public benefits, reduce taxes or distribute government funds, including their financing and electoral conditions.

How we classify topics

Condemned1Statements: September 10, 2026. Not selected. Activate to add.Defended or excused0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Challenged the characterization0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Minimized0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Mixed or conditional0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Explicitly stayed out0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.

Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.

By category Timeline

Statement history

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 10, 2026

1 matching statement. Dates: September 10, 2026

1 published statement. Dates: September 10, 2026

Condemned

1 published statement. Dates: September 10, 2026

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 10, 2026

Catherine Rampell

Role at the time: Economics journalist commenting on her own X account

September 10, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Trump’s $5,000 election pledge: policy dividend or vote-buying?

"no checks have been issued"

Why we used this label

The post presents a negative assessment of the pledge's credibility, not a legal conclusion about vote-buying.

Catherine Rampell compares Trump's election pledge with previous promised checks (opens in a new tab)

· Catherine Rampell

Original post or statement body

Rampell lists Trump's proposed DOGE, tariff, health-subsidy, and election-contingent checks, then questions the credibility of the latest promise. Her comparison and payment-history claim are attributed to her; this record does not independently audit each prior proposal.

Read statement Trump’s $5,000 election pledge: policy dividend or vote-buying?