Pentagon spokesperson dismisses April impeachment effort

Pentagon Press Secretary

Secretary Hegseth will continue to protect the homeland and project peace through strength. This is just another charade in an attempt to distract the American people from the major successes we have had here at the Department of War.
Open source (opens in a new tab)House Dems launch impeachment push against HegsethParagraph attributing an emailed response to Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson.
Open source (opens in a new tab)House Democrats file articles of impeachment against HegsethParagraphs 126–128, attributed statement from Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson.

Source and context

Reporting

House Dems launch impeachment push against Hegseth (opens in a new tab)Paragraph attributing an emailed response to Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson.

About this source

Fox News Digital attributes this statement to Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson in an emailed response to the April impeachment proposal. Fox News Digital and CBS News each attribute substantially the same response to Wilson. This is reported attribution, not a Department of Defense primary publication.

Reporting

House Democrats file articles of impeachment against Hegseth (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs 126–128, attributed statement from Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson.

About this source

CBS News attributes this statement to Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson in response to the April impeachment proposal. Fox News Digital and CBS News each attribute substantially the same response to Wilson. This is reported attribution, not a Department of Defense primary publication.

Before the quotation

Fox News Digital and CBS News reported Wilson’s attributed response to Ansari’s April filing of H.Res. 1177.

After the quotation

The reports do not present the statement as a response to Massie’s later September procedural notice.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Case context: Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to whether the House should impeach Hegseth under the stated proposals, Wilson frames the April effort as a charade and presents Hegseth’s work as successful. This substantively rejects the proposed removal rather than merely disputing an isolated description.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Pete Hegseth
Pete Hegseth
Credit: Gage Skidmore

Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?

Explore the case context, sources and public responses.

Read the full case

More from this case

Read the full case

David Manney

Massie deserves credit for forcing Congress to confront a question too many lawmakers would rather leave blurry. America shouldn't drift into permanent war simply because presidents of either party find congressional approval inconvenient. But a serious constitutional dispute deserves the correct opponent. Massie found the fight. But like an idiot, he aimed at the wrong man.
Read statement

Free Speech For People

In supporting Trump’s constitutional violations and actively participating in, or even initiating, the actions noted above, Hegseth has failed to faithfully discharge the duties of his office. Further, Hegseth participated in multiple unauthorized, unsecured communications on Signal with individuals who are not government employees, jeopardizing national security and demonstrating a dangerous lack of judgment. He must be held accountable for his actions.
Read statement

MoveOn

Hegseth has shown he cannot be trusted with the power of this office and this position. Impeachment and aggressive oversight are necessary steps to stop further abuses.
Read statement