Andrea James calls Flock-style surveillance networks an unacceptable intrusion into privacy
Andrea JamesIndependent candidate for governor of Massachusetts, in an emailed statement from her campaign
Andrea James, an independent candidate for Massachusetts governor, said in a statement to Dispute Index that Flock-style surveillance networks are an unacceptable intrusion into privacy. She cited a lack of transparency about who can access the data, across which jurisdictions and for what purposes, and said corporate policies are no substitute for legal protections.
“Flock-style surveillance networks represent an unacceptable intrusion into privacy”
Emailed statement
Read the full email
Flock-style surveillance networks represent an unacceptable intrusion into privacy, compounded by the lack of transparency surrounding who can access the data, across which jurisdictions, and for what purposes. People cannot meaningfully challenge surveillance when the collection, sharing, and use of their information remain beyond public scrutiny. Expanding AI-powered monitoring without adequate, enforceable safeguards deepens that imbalance of power. Corporate policies are no substitute for legal protections, and claims of public safety do not override civil liberties. The government must justify its surveillance, not the public its privacy.
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Emailed statement
Emailed statement from Andrea James to Dispute Index on license plate readers
Flock-style surveillance networks represent an unacceptable intrusion into privacy, compounded by the lack of transparency surrounding who can access the data, across which jurisdictions, and for what purposes. People cannot meaningfully challenge surveillance when the collection, sharing, and use of their information remain beyond public scrutiny. Expanding AI-powered monitoring without adequate, enforceable safeguards deepens that imbalance of power. Corporate policies are no substitute for legal protections, and claims of public safety do not override civil liberties. The government must justify its surveillance, not the public its privacy.
About this source
Ari Goode, communications director for Andrea James's campaign for Massachusetts governor, sent this statement by email in reply to a Dispute Index request for comment, attributing it to James as an independent candidate. The link is to her campaign site; the statement itself is not published there. The text is reproduced as sent.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Dispute Index asked James's campaign whether she supports, opposes or wants changes to Flock-style license plate camera networks in Massachusetts. Her communications director replied with a statement attributed to her.
After the quotation
James continued, "Corporate policies are no substitute for legal protections, and claims of public safety do not override civil liberties. The government must justify its surveillance, not the public its privacy."
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. James calls the networks an unacceptable intrusion into privacy, so we labeled it Condemned. She calls for adequate, enforceable safeguards and legal protections without naming a specific remedy such as a ban, funding cut, pause or warrant requirement, so the statement sits outside the remedy ladder.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseErik Underwood says he opposes Flock-style license plate camera networks in Colorado
“I oppose Flock style license plate camera networks in Colorado.”Read statement
Sondra Wilson says Iowa should cut public funding for further expansion of Flock-style surveillance networks
“My position is to cut public funding for further expansion of Flock-style surveillance networks across Iowa.”Read statement
Sondra Wilson says expanding Flock cameras should be off the table until Iowa reforms its justice system
“Until we substantially improve Iowa's justice system, I don't believe expanding Flock cameras should be on the table. Again, backwards priorities by government officials, and trust needs to be earned.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Andrea James calls Flock-style surveillance networks an unacceptable intrusion into privacy
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4605-andrea-james-an-independent-candidate-for-massachusetts-governor
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Andrea James calls Flock-style surveillance networks an unacceptable intrusion into privacy". First published: 2026-10-05. Last updated: 2026-10-05. https://disputeindex.com/events/4605-andrea-james-an-independent-candidate-for-massachusetts-governor