Aquiles La Grave questions Boulder's Flock contract in a sanctuary city
Aquiles La GraveEntrepreneur and candidate for mayor of Boulder
Aquiles La Grave asked how Boulder can be a sanctuary city while using AI-assisted mass surveillance from a company with a checkered record of sharing data with federal agencies, and said the council has accepted that the contract is administrative and outside its say.
“How does the city explain being a sanctuary city at the same time as having AI-assisted mass surveillance with a company that has, at best, a checkered track record of sharing that information with the very agencies that we’re trying to protect our immigrants from? Council feels comfortable enough with being told by the city manager that that’s an administrative contract, and therefore, they have no say in it.”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Boulder Reporting Lab article on Aquiles La Grave's campaign for mayor of Boulder, based on an interview with the candidate.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Boulder Reporting Lab reported that La Grave said the council should have exercised greater control over the city's contract with Flock Safety, which provides Boulder's license-plate reader cameras, and that city staff put the contract out for competitive bidding in March after public opposition.
After the quotation
The article reports that the city manager's office is expected to select the winning bidder.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate camera systems such as Flock should exist and be used. La Grave questions how Boulder can be a sanctuary city while using AI-assisted mass surveillance from a company with a checkered record on data sharing, and faults the council for not asserting control over the contract; he criticizes the arrangement and seeks oversight without calling to end the cameras.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseStegner campaign platform supports warrants for Flock data access
“The mass surveillance and warrantless tracking enabled by Flock cameras raises serious and legitimate concerns.”Read statement
Janoo campaign platform calls for a Flock camera ban
“Protect Vermonters from mass surveillance by prohibiting the sale of sensitive personal information, banning surveillance technologies such as Flock cameras”Read statement
Kreiss-Tomkins proposes a statewide ban on Flock cameras
“Protect Alaskans' privacy by issuing a statewide ban on Flock cameras and similar AI-driven mass-surveillance technology.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Aquiles La Grave questions Boulder's Flock contract in a sanctuary city
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3130-aquiles-la-grave-asked-how-boulder-can-be
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Aquiles La Grave questions Boulder's Flock contract in a sanctuary city". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3130-aquiles-la-grave-asked-how-boulder-can-be