Xaviaer DuRousseau
Role at the time: Political commentator and PragerU presenter, posting in his personal capacity
Response to this claim
Wilkins's complaint against Seraphin says she "is not now and never has been an agent for any intelligence agency" and "has never set foot in Israel."
“YOU ATTACHED KASH PATEL AND ALEXIS WILKINS’S PHOTO TO A POST CALLING OUT MOSSAD HONEYPOTS.”
DuRousseau's caption evaluates Schaffer's honeypot implication and rebuts the explanation in the quoted post.
Why we used this label
The reference point is the proposition that Alexis Wilkins is, or was, a foreign intelligence agent, specifically an Israeli or Mossad "honeypot" in a relationship with Kash Patel to compromise him. DuRousseau disputes Schaffer's account that he was sued for criticizing Israel, says the post carried a honeypot implication, and calls Schaffer's posts lies. That rejects the accusation and disputes how Schaffer described his own remark, so we used Challenged the characterization. The closest competing label is Denied. It loses because "the lies" refers to a year of Schaffer's posts and DuRousseau does not say in terms that Wilkins is not an agent. Condemned does not apply: he does not assert the proposition. Evidence level: his own post on X.