Skip to content

The Dispute Index

About Corrections

Loading record

The Dispute Index

Read the sources behind disputed public statements.

About Corrections Privacy

Facebook (opens in a new tab)Instagram (opens in a new tab)Threads (opens in a new tab)X (opens in a new tab)

Vincent Woo on Scientific Research | The Dispute Index

Vincent Woo on Scientific Research

Statements and actions by Vincent Woo on this topic.

Public disputes concerning scientific research, research methods, authorship, credit, collaboration, publication, and research conduct.

How we classify topics

Condemned1Statements: September 8, 2026. Not selected. Activate to add.Defended or excused0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Challenged the characterization0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Minimized0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Mixed or conditional0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Explicitly stayed out0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.

Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.

By category Timeline

Statement history

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 matching statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 published statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

Vincent Woo
Role at the time: Personal public response
September 8, 2026Condemned
Responding to
OpenAI improperly pressured the researchers over authorship and publication of the mathematical results.
"A bit cutthroat, I think."
Why we used this label
Explicit negative assessment of the handling of credit.
Vincent Woo criticizes the reported competition for credit (opens in a new tab)
Early reaction to Buckmaster's account, before Bubeck's detailed rebuttal.

Our account of this statement has been corrected. 1 correction

Read statement Did OpenAI improperly pressure mathematicians over authorship and credit?