Skip to content

The Dispute Index

About Corrections

Loading record

The Dispute Index

Read the sources behind disputed public statements.

About Corrections Privacy

Facebook (opens in a new tab)Instagram (opens in a new tab)Threads (opens in a new tab)X (opens in a new tab)

Samuel Davenport on Scientific Research | The Dispute Index

Samuel Davenport on Scientific Research

Statements and actions by Samuel Davenport on this topic.

Public disputes concerning scientific research, research methods, authorship, credit, collaboration, publication, and research conduct.

How we classify topics

Condemned0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Defended or excused0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Challenged the characterization1Statements: September 8, 2026. Not selected. Activate to add.Minimized0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Mixed or conditional0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Explicitly stayed out0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.

Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.

By category Timeline

Statement history

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 matching statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 published statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

Samuel Davenport
Role at the time: Personal public response to Bubeck
September 8, 2026Challenged the characterization
Responding to
Bubeck says the disputed authorship proposal concerned a rewrite of OpenAI's proof, not removing Alpöge from his own work.
"That is clearly contradictory."
Why we used this label
Challenges the coherence of the credit explanation, not the mathematical proof.
Samuel Davenport challenges the coherence of the credit explanation (opens in a new tab)

Questions why a company would claim the result while offering academic accolades to the other researchers.

Our account of this statement has been corrected. 1 correction

Read statement Did OpenAI improperly pressure mathematicians over authorship and credit?