Pamela Mishkin
Role at the time: Artificial-intelligence researcher
Condemned
Statement summary
Pamela Mishkin treats DraftKings' targeting of vulnerable people as an example of present AI harm and calls for developer liability.
“The HF agents aren't so different from the systems DraftKings uses to target vulnerable people.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Pamela Mishkin identifies DraftKings' targeting as AI harm · Pamela Mishkin
Mishkin discussed present AI harms alongside risks from rogue agents and identified DraftKings' targeting of vulnerable people as an example. Mishkin called for public input into model alignment and liability for AI developers.
Why we used this label
Reference point: DraftKings' alleged use of AI-targeted promotions to exploit vulnerable gamblers. Her full post evaluates the named targeting as harm and argues developers should be liable; it is not bare reporting.