Katelyn Burns
Role at the time: Freelance journalist and columnist, writing under her own byline for Xtra Magazine
Statement summary
In a signed opinion column for Xtra Magazine about Democratic candidates conceding ground on transgender policy, journalist Katelyn Burns wrote that Hinojosa drew an online backlash by appearing to mock pronouns, noted that none of the words in the ad's closing line are pronouns, and said she had argued on Bluesky that mocking transgender people's pronouns with that style of joke was wrong.
“Gina Hinojosa, the Democratic nominee for Texas governor, spawned an online backlash from some lefty trans posters by appearing to mock pronouns. "My pronouns are mom, Texan and soon-to-be governor," she says in a recent campaign video posted to YouTube. When I made a post on Bluesky pointing out that none of those words are pronouns, and implied that it was wrong to mock trans people's pronouns with this style of joke, a bunch of Bluesky liberals took umbrage.”
Signed opinion column by Katelyn Burns, published September 16, 2026 at 1:42 p.m. Eastern. The passage on Hinojosa sits inside a wider argument about Democratic candidates conceding ground on transgender policy; the column's other examples are James Talarico in Texas and Josh Turek in Iowa. Excerpt transcribed from the rendered page.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Why we used this label
The case asks whether the closing line of Hinojosa's September 9 "Pronouns" ad — "My pronouns are Mom, Texan, and soon to be: Governor" — mocked transgender Texans; that line is the fixed reference point, not Abbott's attacks on her record. Burns states in her own voice that it was wrong to mock transgender people's pronouns with this style of joke, and places Hinojosa in a column arguing that such concessions harm transgender people. That is an express criticism of the conduct at issue. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, since a strand of the passage is the descriptive point that none of the named words are pronouns. That loses because she does not stop at the description: she goes on to the substantive evaluation that the joke was wrong. minimizes does not apply, and she offers no defence of the ad.