Fred Wellman
Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. House in Missouri's 2nd District and Army veteran, in a quote-post on his personal X account
Statement summary
Quote-posting a Washington Post reporter's post about the paper's report on Iran war deaths, Fred Wellman wrote on X on Sept. 18, 2026 that the matter is possibly one of the most egregious acts yet by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. He also said it breaks a basic principle in the relationship with the American people and military families, that he is enraged, and that Hegseth must go.
“This is possibly one of the most egregious acts yet by Hegseth. He has no honor. No decency. This breaks the most basic bedrock principle of our relationship with the American people and our military families. I am enraged by this. Hegseth must go.”
The speaker's own post, read through fxtwitter and confirmed through X's oEmbed endpoint (identical text); the tweet ID's embedded timestamp matches 19:25:17 UTC. It is a quote-post of Tara Copp's post (x.com/TaraCopp/status/2101019893147615240), which is what 'This' refers to; the post itself names no figures. Wellman's X bio reads 'Democratic Nominee for Congress in MO-2', and he won the Aug. 4, 2026 primary.
Why we used this label
The case's fixed reference point is the Defense Department's public accounting of U.S. military deaths since the Iran war began on Feb. 28, 2026, as published in the Defense Casualty Analysis System (18 deaths as of Sept. 18, 2026). Wellman's own words, posted over the Post's report that more deaths occurred than the Pentagon has disclosed, call the matter possibly one of Hegseth's most egregious acts and say it breaks the most basic bedrock principle of the relationship with military families, which criticizes the Pentagon's disclosure of deaths as the report describes it. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because 'possibly' hedges the ranking of the act and the post takes its subject only from the quote-posted report. That loses because 'possibly' qualifies only how egregious the act is, not whether it is criticized, and the remaining sentences state the criticism without any unresolved condition.