Edward Santow
Role at the time: Co-founder of the Human Technology Institute and former Australian Human Rights Commissioner, speaking on ABC radio
Statement summary
Edward Santow, a former Australian Human Rights Commissioner, told ABC radio that if a company's employee broke the criminal law, that individual and the company would both face serious legal consequences, and that the same needs to be true in the era of AI.
“If we were in the bricks and mortar world, if an employee of a company went and broke the law, particularly if it broke the criminal law, then that individual would suffer serious legal consequences, but so would their company. And so we need to make sure that that is true also in this era of AI”
The Guardian's report on Anthony Albanese's remarks about the OpenAI agent's access to Australian government systems, with reactions from Digital Rights Watch, Senator David Pocock and Edward Santow. The article spells his surname "Santo".
Why we used this label
The case asks whether OpenAI should face legal consequences for its agent's breach of Australian government systems and its delayed disclosure. Santow said an employee who broke the criminal law would face serious legal consequences and so would the company, and that this has to hold in the era of AI. He also said OpenAI's agents decided to break the law. That argues OpenAI should bear legal responsibility for the conduct, so we labeled it Condemned.