Anshul Kundaje on Artificial Intelligence

Statements and actions by Anshul Kundaje on this topic.

Public disputes concerning artificial intelligence, including its development, uses, safety, governance, effects on creative work, and role in research.

How we classify topics

Condemned0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Defended or excused0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Challenged the characterization0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Minimized0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Mixed or conditional1Statements: September 8, 2026. Not selected. Activate to add.Explicitly stayed out0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.

Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.

By category Timeline

Statement history

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 matching statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 published statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

Anshul Kundaje
Role at the time: Personal public response
September 8, 2026Mixed or conditional
Responding to
OpenAI says its researchers and agents did not access Buckmaster and Alpöge's unpublished work for the project.
"very clear legally binding statements"
Why we used this label
Conditional policy demand rather than a finding of misconduct in this case.
Anshul Kundaje calls for clear policies protecting researchers (opens in a new tab)

Conditional policy demand addressed to both OpenAI and Anthropic, rather than proof of a violation in this case.

Our account of this statement has been corrected. 1 correction

Read statement Did OpenAI improperly pressure mathematicians over authorship and credit?