Loading record

The Dispute Index

Read the sources behind disputed public statements.

Andreas Kirsch on AI Research, Scientific Credit and Integrity | The Dispute Index

Person-topic record

Andreas Kirsch on AI Research, Scientific Credit and Integrity

A sourced history of statements and actions associated with this topic.

Disputes over authorship, credit, research conduct and publication practices involving artificial intelligence and scientific work.

Scope: Covers attributable disagreements over contributions, publication pressure, collaboration and use of research material. Treats mathematical correctness, authorship conduct and data-access allegations as separate questions.

Condemned0Distinct events · No published events — Not selected; activate to add.Defended or excused0Distinct events · No published events — Not selected; activate to add.Challenged the characterization0Distinct events · No published events — Not selected; activate to add.Minimized0Distinct events · No published events — Not selected; activate to add.Mixed or conditional1Distinct events · September 8, 2026 — Selected filter; activate to remove.Explicitly stayed out0Distinct events · No published events — Not selected; activate to add.

Counts document individual events. They do not assign an overall position.

By category Timeline

Distinct documented events

Position history

1 event on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 matching event. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 total published event. Dates: September 8, 2026

Mixed or conditional

1 distinct published event overall. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 event on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026

September 8, 2026Mixed or conditional

Addressed record

Bubeck says the disputed authorship proposal concerned a rewrite of OpenAI's proof, not removing Alpöge from his own work.

“The whole thing is def very messy”

Speaker capacity: Personal public response
Editorial rationale: Qualified acceptance of the explanation without declaring the whole dispute resolved.

Andreas Kirsch gives a qualified response to Bubeck's account (opens in a new tab)

Says the account fits his expectations, calls the situation messy and qualifies congratulations on the results checking out.

View context Did OpenAI improperly pressure mathematicians over authorship and credit?