Ed Sheeran breaks silence: "I am not complicit"

Musician; tour headliner

Macklemore coming off tour was the promoter's decision, it was not mine... I am not complicit. I have my personal views on this devastating conflict. Just because I choose not to speak publicly, it doesn't mean I don't have them, and it doesn't mean I don't care... I respect Macklemore's strength of purpose to stand up and shout for what he believes. However, there is room for multiple approaches to the same end: Peace.
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ed Sheeran’s September 15 Instagram statement on Macklemore’s removal from the Loop TourPost captioned “It’s important that I set out some facts.”; statement carried across the post’s images.

Source and context

Original post

Ed Sheeran’s September 15 Instagram statement on Macklemore’s removal from the Loop Tour (opens in a new tab)Post captioned “It’s important that I set out some facts.”; statement carried across the post’s images.

About this source

Ed Sheeran’s own account, @teddysphotos, posting the statement in which he says the promoter and venues made the decision. The post was opened and its author, account and posting date were confirmed directly. The body of the statement is published as images rather than caption text, so the wording quoted in the Dispute Index record is taken from news transcription of those images, not read from the post itself.

Before the quotation

Posted to Instagram on September 15, 2026, after remaining publicly silent on the controversy.

After the quotation

This was the first substantive public statement from Sheeran since Macklemore's removal.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Macklemore’s “Free Palestine” speech and removal from Ed Sheeran’s U.S. tour

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Sheeran distances himself from the removal decision and affirms he is "not complicit," while also saying he respects Macklemore's approach and suggesting his own different, quieter approach serves the same goal of peace — combining a partial defense of Macklemore with a deliberate choice not to take the same public stance himself, rather than clearly condemning or endorsing the removal.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Macklemore

More from this case

Read the full case

Elan Carr

Free Palestine [is an antisemitic statement]... freedom of speech doesn't give the rapper the right to hijack a stage.
Read statement

Jonathan Greenblatt

Glad to see Macklemore off Ed Sheeran’s tour. For years, Macklemore has pushed antisemitic tropes and demonized Israel and Israelis. Now he certainly has the 1A right to speak out and express his views, but demonizing Jews and Israelis shouldn’t be rewarded.
Read statement

Lukas Graham

Money doesn't give you the right to own the conversation... Nobody's bank balance should decide who gets to speak.
Read statement