Palacio rejectsthe hate-speech characterization.

Music lawyer interviewed by LOS40

no es un discurso de odio

Source and context

Interview

Espe Palacio on Macklemore’s speech (opens in a new tab)First interview answer, followed by discussion of US and European contracts

About this source

Visible creation time: September 10, 17:31 CEST; URL says September 11. Interview recording time unknown. This records Palacio’s opinion.

Before the quotation

Asked whether political expression warrants removing an artist.

After the quotation

Her contract analysis distinguishes the United States from Europe.

Challenged the characterization
How this statement is classified

Explicitly rejects the hate-speech characterization.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Macklemore

More from this case

StandWithUs

Ed Sheeran and Loop Tour Leadership must respect all their fans, reject anti-Israel hate and remove Macklemore now.
Read statement

Mehdi Hasan

But no, your side is insisting Macklemore be removed from the concert tour for his views which clearly is a free speech issue.
Read statement
Read the case