Foster calls Connecticut's incarceration fee a regressive tax

Lisa FosterCo-founder, Fines and Fees Justice Center; former California Superior Court judge

Condemned

Foster, a co-founder of the Fines and Fees Justice Center and a former California judge, said laws like Connecticut's function as an extra financial punishment on people who have already served their sentence.

“It's not the way we should be running the criminal justice system. It's a regressive tax”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)They served their time in prison. Then the bills arrived.Full article, including the sections headed "Additional punishment," "The John Gottis of the world," "Blood from a stone," "Calls for repeal," "Collections continue," "A punch in the heart" and "Priority creditor"

Case updates

Connecticut's prison-fee debt law: want updates?

We'll send an email if lawmakers take up repeal or changes to the law, if Lamont's office offers administrative relief, or if state officials answer critics.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Lisa Foster in this case

Every statement by Lisa Foster
Tracy DeSenti looks at a framed photograph of her late husband, Billy DeSenti.
Credit: Sarah Gordon/CT Mirror

Where this statement fits

Should Connecticut collect per diem incarceration fees from former inmates' settlements and windfalls?

Connecticut has charged incarcerated people a daily fee for the cost of their imprisonment since 1995, and state law lets the Department of Administrative Services collect on that debt for up to 20 years after release, including by taking up to half of a lottery win, inheritance or lawsuit settlement, or a lien against a deceased person's estate. A Connecticut Mirror investigation published September 27, 2026 found the daily rate has reached $347, that a year in prison can produce a debt of nearly $127,000, and that the state collected about $21 million this way from 2020 to mid-2026 from hundreds of formerly incarcerated people, including money from wrongful-death and police-brutality settlements. The legislature narrowed the law in 2022 and 2024, and a federal lawsuit led the state to withdraw its claims against its four named plaintiffs by October 2024, but collection from others has continued. The dispute is whether Connecticut should be allowed to collect this debt from former inmates' settlements, inheritances and windfalls at all, not whether any individual's specific bill was calculated correctly.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

They served their time in prison. Then the bills arrived. (opens in a new tab)Full article, including the sections headed "Additional punishment," "The John Gottis of the world," "Blood from a stone," "Calls for repeal," "Collections continue," "A punch in the heart" and "Priority creditor"

About this source

CT Mirror investigation into Connecticut's cost-of-incarceration collection law, published September 27, 2026. Based on a review of hundreds of probate-court cases filed from 2020 to 2026 and interviews with more than a dozen affected people, state officials, legislators and advocates. Anchors this case's account of the practice's scale, mechanics and the on-record positions of DAS, the Attorney General's office and named advocates and affected individuals.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Foster was commenting generally on state laws that charge incarcerated people for the cost of their imprisonment, including Connecticut's.

After the quotation

She said it does not matter that a person has already served their sentence and paid their debt to society.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Foster rejects the law as an improper way to run the criminal justice system and frames it as an unfair extra tax on formerly incarcerated people.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Connecticut Department of Correction, Connecticut Department of Administrative Services

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Lisa Foster, Foster calls Connecticut's incarceration fee a regressive taxDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Foster calls Connecticut's incarceration fee a regressive tax
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3264-foster-a-co-founder-of-the-fines-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Foster calls Connecticut's incarceration fee a regressive tax". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3264-foster-a-co-founder-of-the-fines-and