The Republican National Committee says the Missouri Supreme Court's relief could "sow more confusion among the electorate"

Republican National CommitteeNational party committee, filing as intervenor-respondent with the National Republican Congressional Committee and the Missouri Republican State Committee

Defended or excused

In a brief supporting Secretary of State Denny Hoskins's stay application, the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee and the Missouri Republican State Committee wrote that it is difficult to imagine a judicial action that could "sow more confusion among the electorate" than the relief the Supreme Court of Missouri granted. They asked the U.S. Supreme Court to grant Hoskins's application.

“It is difficult to imagine a judicial action that could sow more confusion among the electorate or inflict more damage to the public’s confidence in the integrity of the congressional elections than the relief the Missouri Supreme Court granted.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Intervenors-Respondents' Brief in Support of Applicant's Emergency Application for Stay, Hoskins v. Von Glahn, No. 26A304 · Republican National CommitteeBrief p. 2, filed September 4, 2026

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Docket for No. 26A304, Denny Hoskins v. Richard Von Glahn · Supreme Court of the United StatesProceedings and Orders, entries dated September 4 to September 8, 2026

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)von Glahn v. Hoskins, No. SC101805 (Mo. Sept. 3, 2026) (en banc) · Supreme Court of MissouriOpinion, footnote 8 and pp. 12-14

Case updates

Missouri's map fight after the Supreme Court order

We'll email you if anyone seeks further Supreme Court review, when Missouri voters decide Proposition A, or if state officials respond to the order.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Missouri's proposed 2025 congressional map appears beside a Supreme Court order.
Credit: Missouri House Research and Supreme Court of the United States; composite by The Dispute Index

Where this statement fits

Should Missouri be allowed to use its 2025 congressional map in the 2026 general election?

Missouri lawmakers passed a new congressional map, House Bill 1, in September 2025, and the State used it in the August 4, 2026 primary. On September 3, 2026, the Supreme Court of Missouri ruled unanimously that a referendum petition kept the map from taking effect and that the 2022 map remains in force for the November general election. Gov. Mike Kehoe, Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, Secretary of State Denny Hoskins and President Donald Trump said in early September that the primary map should be used in November, and the Eighth Circuit held on September 21 that using the 2022 map violates the U.S. Constitution. People Not Politicians, the Campaign Legal Center and the ACLU argued that Missouri law makes the 2022 map the only valid map and that ballots had been mailed under it. On September 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court, in an unsigned per curiam order that records no dissent, stayed the federal injunctions, said that under state law the 2022 map must be used, and said lower courts should not require use of the 2025 map in the 2026 election. Kehoe called that decision disappointing and said Missouri will follow the order.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Intervenors-Respondents' Brief in Support of Applicant's Emergency Application for Stay, Hoskins v. Von Glahn, No. 26A304 (opens in a new tab) · Republican National CommitteeBrief p. 2, filed September 4, 2026

About this source

Brief filed by three Republican party committees as intervenors, supporting Secretary of State Denny Hoskins's application to stay the Supreme Court of Missouri's September 3 ruling. The docket lists the filing as the response of the Republican National Committee, et al.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Docket for No. 26A304, Denny Hoskins v. Richard Von Glahn (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesProceedings and Orders, entries dated September 4 to September 8, 2026

About this source

The Court's docket records Secretary of State Denny Hoskins's September 4 application to stay the Supreme Court of Missouri's September 3 ruling, the responses and amicus briefs filed September 4 to 7, and Justice Kavanaugh's September 8 denial.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

von Glahn v. Hoskins, No. SC101805 (Mo. Sept. 3, 2026) (en banc) (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of MissouriOpinion, footnote 8 and pp. 12-14

About this source

Unanimous opinion reversing the Cole County Circuit Court. It holds that the referendum petition on House Bill 1 was legal, sufficient and timely, orders the Secretary of State to certify it for the November 2026 ballot, and enjoins him from using the 2025 map in the November 2026 general election unless voters approve it.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The Supreme Court of Missouri had ruled on September 3 that the 2022 map remains in force for the November general election, and Hoskins applied to the U.S. Supreme Court on September 4 for a stay.

After the quotation

Justice Brett Kavanaugh denied Hoskins's application on September 8.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. The committees oppose the state court's order, which barred that map, and ask the Court to stay it, which defends using the map. The closest competing label, condemns, does not fit because their criticism is aimed at the state court, not at the use of the map.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Supreme Court of Missouri

More from this case

Read the full case

The National Democratic Redistricting Committee says the Supreme Court "denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander"

National Democratic Redistricting Committee

“BREAKING: SCOTUS just denied Missouri Republicans' third attempt to jam through their 2025 gerrymander! 👏 This reaffirms what the state's highest court already said weeks ago — the 2025 map was never the law. Missouri Republicans tried to silence voters. Today, they lost.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Republican National Committee, The Republican National Committee says the Missouri Supreme Court's relief could "sow more confusion among the electorate"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
The Republican National Committee says the Missouri Supreme Court's relief could "sow more confusion among the electorate"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2677-in-a-brief-supporting-secretary-of-state-denny

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "The Republican National Committee says the Missouri Supreme Court's relief could "sow more confusion among the electorate"". First published: 2026-09-26. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/2677-in-a-brief-supporting-secretary-of-state-denny