Sam Stein calls Trump’s White House press ban authoritarian

Managing editor at The Bulwark, speaking on Bulwark Takes

We are firmly on the slope of authoritarianism. This is it.
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)The Bulwark: Sam Stein and Will Saletan discuss Trump’s White House press banPress-ban discussion 10:36–17:37; Stein at 11:23–11:49 and 16:38–17:35; Saletan at 11:59–12:36 and 15:09–16:08; embedded Barrasso excerpt 13:01–13:46.

Source and context

Original video

The Bulwark: Sam Stein and Will Saletan discuss Trump’s White House press ban (opens in a new tab)Press-ban discussion 10:36–17:37; Stein at 11:23–11:49 and 16:38–17:35; Saletan at 11:59–12:36 and 15:09–16:08; embedded Barrasso excerpt 13:01–13:46.

About this source

Original Bulwark Takes video containing Stein’s and Saletan’s responses to the White House exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico. The video also plays part of Barrasso’s NBC interview; NBC’s original recording and transcript remain the primary sources for his remarks.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

After summarizing reporters being turned away and losing credentials, Stein explained why he considered the exclusion consequential.

After the quotation

Stein distinguished private-platform moderation from government retaliation and urged collective action, citing other outlets’ response to a 2009 Obama White House briefing exclusion of Fox News.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case concerns whether Trump should exclude the three outlets because of their coverage. Stein describes the exclusion as authoritarian, says it attacks constitutional press freedom and urges collective resistance, directly condemning the action.

Recorded on
Published here
Symbolic editorial illustration of three broadcast cameras outside the White House gate at dusk.
Credit: The Dispute Index / AI-assisted illustration.

More from this case

Read the full case

Wes Moore

the president continues to use the Constitution like it is a suggestion box simply because he does not like the coverage. And so I would just hope that this administration would spend a little bit of time reading, instead of just talking.
Read statement

Dana Bash

And I -- it’s kind of a loss for words, especially when the president says he just doesn’t want negative reporting. It’s critical reporting. It is intended to get facts.
Read statement