Daniel Samet says El-Sayed “will use his perch in the Senate to undermine America and empower its enemies”
Jeane Kirkpatrick Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, quoted in Fox News Digital
“Anyone refusing to disavow America-hater Hasan Piker should never be elected to Congress. El-Sayed will use his perch in the Senate to undermine America and empower its enemies.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Fox News Digital’s report, published September 20, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. EDT, on national-security concerns raised about Abdul El-Sayed’s Senate candidacy. It quotes Daniel Samet directly and reports his characterization of El-Sayed’s associations, and quotes campaign spokesperson Cole Wozniak’s response.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The article opened by explaining that members of Congress are generally eligible for classified access without a formal security clearance, and reported that this had raised concerns among “national security and policy experts.”
After the quotation
The article went on to cite, among other things, El-Sayed’s introduction at a campaign rally by a man it said has praised dead Hezbollah members as “martyr[s],” his sharing a stage with a cleric it said has praised Hamas’s October 7 attack, and his acceptance of an endorsement from a figure it said has praised both Hamas and Hezbollah. It then quoted campaign spokesperson Cole Wozniak responding, “Abdul’s running to keep Americans safe and bring down costs for Michigan families,” and pointing to Republican opponent Mike Rogers’s business dealings with companies tied to China and Saudi Arabia; the quoted response did not address Samet’s characterization of El-Sayed’s associations.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Daniel Samet’s claim that Abdul El-Sayed’s associations show sympathy for terrorist causes
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Samet makes the characterization himself and presents it as fact, saying El-Sayed will “undermine America and empower its enemies” because of his associations. That defends and presses the characterization rather than merely reporting it. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional; it loses because Samet states his conclusion (that El-Sayed should not be elected) without qualification.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Abdul El-Sayed
Daniel Samet’s claim that Abdul El-Sayed’s associations show sympathy for terrorist causes
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Disgusting anti-Muslim bigotry and scare-mongering here, even by Fox standards. We would never allow this for a Black or Jewish politician.”Read statement