Kellyanne Conway says El-Sayed should distance himself from Piker as Democrats did from Platner

Republican pollster and former senior counselor to the president, as a co-host of Fox News' The Five

So, Harold, respectfully, I know at least one person who's willing to entertain this. His name is Abdul El-Sayed. He's palling around with this guy. He will not disclaim him and the crazy by-the-moment things that he's saying. And I think that Hasan Piker the person is actually even less important than Hasan Piker the performance artist now, because it represents how difficult it is now and will be in 2028 for Democrats to transition from shock-the-conscience crazy talk in the primaries to trying to present themselves as reasonable and semi-capitalist and connected to voters, to everyday voters. The way that some responsible Democrats wanted to distance themselves and their party from Graham Platner and his Nazi tattoo and his abuse of women and his adultery, I think that people should be doing that now with Hasan Piker. Here's the problem with Piker: the Democratic Party has allowed itself to be infiltrated by influencers and streamers and to live online.
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)The Five — Kellyanne Conway on Piker and Abdul El-Sayed · Fox News00:08:28–00:09:27

Source and context

Original video

The Five — Kellyanne Conway on Piker and Abdul El-Sayed (opens in a new tab) · Fox News00:08:28–00:09:27

About this source

Fox News' own recording of the twelve-minute opening segment of The Five for 18 September 2026, in which the panel discusses Hasan Piker's Axios Show interview. The segment plays the Axios clips of Piker on Iran's nuclear programme and on Mao Zedong, and the Oval Office exchange in which President Trump called Piker "a terrible liability." This locator carries Conway's reply to Ford, which turns from Piker to El-Sayed's refusal to disavow him. Fox titled its page for this segment after the closing sentence of this passage.. Speakers were identified from the broadcast itself: MacCallum names the panel in the opening line and hands to each of them by name, and each speaker was confirmed on camera at their locator. Fox's own @TheFive account attributes the closing lines of this passage to Jones, and Fox's page for the segment attributes "the Democratic Party has allowed itself to be infiltrated by influencers" to Conway.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Ford had just said that no Democrat or Republican “in their right mind subscribes to any of this,” and MacCallum had asked Conway to address that along with Reid Hoffman's comments about Kamala Harris.

After the quotation

Conway added that even if El-Sayed disowned him “today” Piker would still reach millions, and that “when you get in bed with dogs, you're going to have fleas.” She then said Piker “goes from vile to violent pretty quickly,” citing his remark that landlords who refuse to rent should be killed and the streets soaked “with their capitalist blood.”

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Hasan Piker's Axios Show interview claims about terrorism, Iran, China and Israel

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the case's fixed reference point — the claims Piker made in the Axios Show interview — Conway condemns. She characterises what Piker is saying as “the crazy by-the-moment things” and “shock-the-conscience crazy talk,” and the Platner comparison treats his statements as disqualifying rather than merely unhelpful. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, which loses because she is not disputing how Piker's remarks have been described; her argument is that a candidate who will not disavow them is the more consequential problem, which extends the condemnation rather than redirecting it.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Hasan Piker, Abdul El-Sayed
Hasan Piker speaking at a rally for Chris Rabb in Philadelphia, PA, April 30, 2026
Credit: Morgan.rice.bassline.design

More from this case

Read the full case

Tom Shillue

Obviously, Hasan Piker is ridiculous. He is a podcaster, he's provocative, he does that, that's his game. But the politicians decided. El-Sayed decided to pal around with him. Why? Because they thought, “I can deal with this controversy because I want his likes, I want his listeners, his viewers.” So he is tied to him. … I don't like that denounce game. You know, I remember we tried that with Obama: “When will you denounce Reverend Wright?” … El-Sayed is on record. He has a terrible record. He's a terrible leftist. So denounce him. Don't say, “When are you going to denounce this other guy?” He's got enough bad things to his name.
Read statement

Harold Ford Jr.

These views are so outside the periphery of the most extreme views in either political party in all of politics in America. And the fact — in some ways I'm disappointed we've been giving this nonsense airtime, because he talks about it in ways, I think, to Joey's point, that he almost tries to normalize it. No Democrat, no Republican, no progressive Democrat or liberal Democrat in their right mind subscribes to any of this. I'm a conservative Democrat.
Read statement

Johnny "Joey" Jones

Hasan Piker is going on the podcast and saying the terrible thing … what he said about Mao. And so, you know, like, “Well, Mao did a lot of great things, it was just that cultural revolution part that was a little bit, you know, wasn't good.” And so what it is is you can't talk bad about a communist or a socialist, no matter who they are, because that's what they believe. And so they have to repaint history. Now, Iran being authoritarian, because I guess that's what they believe as well, there are good parts about it. “Let them have a nuclear weapon. It's just, you know, they have a few domestic policies I don't like.” At the end of the day, Hasan Piker is a poster boy for why we should challenge birthright citizenship. His parents come here from Turkey, they go to college, they have a baby, they take him back to Turkey, they raise him there, and then he comes back here to partake in capitalism and talk bad about it.
Read statement