Case

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

September 27, 2023

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Haaretz reported that United Arab Emirates President Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu about ten days before October 7, 2023 that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major operation. Netanyahu and his office categorically deny that the reported call or warning occurred and say official record checks found no supporting documentation. Reporter Shlomi Eldar says he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence supporting the account, but those materials have not been made public. Naftali Bennett says he knows the report is true; other opposition leaders demand an investigation. The UAE government has declined to confirm or deny the alleged conversation.

Mohammed bin Zayed Al NahyanPrime Minister’s Office of IsraelHaaretzBenjamin Netanyahu
IsraelOctober 7 Attacks

Evidence and limits

The originating account was published on September 8, 2026 by Haaretz reporters Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval and was drawn from their book and interviews. It describes information moving from Yahya Sinwar through a Fatah intermediary and an adviser to the UAE president, followed by a reported 45-minute call in which Mohammed bin Zayed warned Netanyahu that a major event was being prepared. Haaretz says related information also reached Israeli intelligence channels but was not interpreted as a warning of a Gaza assault. Netanyahu’s office says there was no call and no warning, says a review of call and visitor records found no supporting documentation, and has announced planned libel action. In a direct CNN interview, Eldar rejected that denial and said he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence supporting the alleged call; those underlying materials were not displayed or independently authenticated in the segment. The Times of Israel says an unnamed Emirati source confirmed the conversation. Bennett says he knows the report is true but has not publicly explained the basis for that knowledge. The UAE government has declined to confirm or deny the alleged conversation. The call transcript, recording, contemporaneous memorandum, and a named on-record UAE confirmation remain unavailable. This record therefore separates whether the call occurred, whether its contents were transmitted, and whether the warning was specific and actionable. It does not include unsupported claims that Netanyahu intentionally permitted the attack. On September 9, i24NEWS also reported a senior, unnamed Middle East intelligence source saying the UAE passed Israel a warning of significant and imminent Hamas action. The source did not confirm a direct bin Zayed–Netanyahu call, identify the transmission route, or establish what Netanyahu personally received. This adds an anonymous, partial corroboration of a warning reaching Israel but does not resolve the central dispute.

Original material: Netanyahu got an explicit warning before Oct. 7. He didn’t brief security chiefs (opens in a new tab)

What's disputed

The claims below are disputed. Follow each source to see who made it and what they said.

Disputed claim

Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu in late September 2023 that Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major Hamas operation that could cause bloodshed and destabilize the region.

Who made the claim
Haaretz
Date

Sources

Disputed claim

No call between Netanyahu and Mohammed bin Zayed occurred during the relevant period, and Netanyahu received no UAE warning before October 7.

Who made the claim
Prime Minister’s Office of Israel
Date

Sources

Disputed claim

If Netanyahu received the reported warning and failed to alert security leaders or take action, that failure constituted extraordinary or criminal negligence.

Who made the claim
Naftali Bennett
Date

Sources

Arguments

  1. Documented position

    Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval, with separate claims from The Times of Israel and Naftali Bennett.

    The reporters say their evidence supports the alleged warning

    The originating investigation attributes the account to people said to have direct or contemporaneous knowledge. In a direct CNN interview, Shlomi Eldar said he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence supporting the alleged call. The Times of Israel reports separate confirmation from an Emirati source familiar with the conversation, and Naftali Bennett says he knows the report is true.

    Related claim

    Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu in late September 2023 that Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major Hamas operation that could cause bloodshed and destabilize the region.

    Limit of this argument

    Eldar did not display the underlying materials during the interview. No transcript, recording, contemporaneous call memorandum, or named on-record UAE witness has been made public, and Bennett has not explained how he knows.

    Sources

  2. Editorial analysis

    A warning delivered personally could have warranted immediate review

    The reported warning concerned a major operation, bloodshed, and regional destabilization. If delivered personally by a friendly head of state, it could reasonably have added weight to related warning information and warranted immediate transmission and review.

    Related claim

    If Netanyahu received the reported warning and failed to alert security leaders or take action, that failure constituted extraordinary or criminal negligence.

    Limit of this argument

    The public record does not establish the call’s exact words, what supporting intelligence accompanied it, or which concrete preventive action would have followed.

    Sources

  1. Documented position

    Benjamin Netanyahu's office. The UAE's separate response does not confirm or deny the call.

    Netanyahu's office denies that the call and warning occurred

    Netanyahu’s office denies both the call and the warning and says a review of call and visitor records found no supporting entry. The UAE government has declined to authenticate the alleged leaders’ conversation.

    Related claim

    Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu in late September 2023 that Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major Hamas operation that could cause bloodshed and destabilize the region.

    Limit of this argument

    An absence asserted by the office being challenged is not independently verified proof that no conversation occurred; Haaretz stands by its report, and the Times of Israel reports anonymous Emirati corroboration.

    Sources

  2. Editorial analysis

    Reconstructed by The Dispute Index from the cited reporting.

    Intelligence channels may have read the information differently

    The same reporting says related information reached Israeli intelligence channels and was not understood as a warning of an imminent Gaza assault. The underlying messages traveled through intermediaries and could have been interpreted as negotiation pressure or deception rather than a specific operational alert.

    Related claim

    If Netanyahu received the reported warning and failed to alert security leaders or take action, that failure constituted extraordinary or criminal negligence.

    Limit of this argument

    This is an evidence-based counterargument, not an identified public defense from someone who accepts that the reported Netanyahu–MBZ call occurred.

    Sources

Response from Haaretz

Haaretz - Haaretz institutional legal response, public announcement headlineChallenged the characterization

Responding to

Response to the case

"Won't Hesitate to Expose the Truth in Court"

Haaretz rejects Netanyahu's legal demands and says it will defend its reporting concerning the alleged UAE warning.

Why we used this label

This is the newspaper's own response to a claim that its report is false, not routine news reporting assigned to the outlet as a stance.

Before the statement

Netanyahu had threatened libel proceedings and demanded removal, apology, and compensation.

After the statement

The excerpt is a visible headline quotation. The full primary letter was subscriber-restricted; Anadolu supplies additional reporting. This does not prove the warning or that a lawsuit was filed. The timestamp is the announcement's publication, not the letter's delivery time.

Prime Minister’s Office of Israel - Official office of the prime minister of IsraelChallenged the characterization

Responding to

The Prime Minister’s Office says its review of Netanyahu’s call log and office visitor records found no documentation supporting the reported call or an Emirati representative’s visit.

"A thorough examination of the Prime Minister’s call log does not show any supporting entry."

The Prime Minister’s Office said it reviewed call and visitor records and found no documentation supporting the reported call or an Emirati representative’s visit.

Why we used this label

The office offers a specific record-based challenge to the alleged call. The record review is the office’s assertion and has not been independently audited in the available sources.

Before the statement

Eldar and Haaretz reported that a direct 45-minute Netanyahu–MBZ call occurred in late September 2023.

After the statement

Eldar says he possesses contrary documents and records; neither side’s underlying documentary material was public at the editorial cutoff.

Benjamin Netanyahu - Prime minister of Israel and Likud leaderChallenged the characterization

Responding to

No call between Netanyahu and Mohammed bin Zayed occurred during the relevant period, and Netanyahu received no UAE warning before October 7.

"This is a sinister libel with clear political timing."

Netanyahu personally renewed the denial and characterized the report as election-timed political libel.

Why we used this label

He disputes the report’s truth and provenance. The statement is not coded as a defense of his alleged conduct because he denies the underlying event.

Before the statement

The Prime Minister’s Office had already issued a categorical denial on September 8.

After the statement

Netanyahu said he had instructed lawyers to pursue a libel case and redirected responsibility toward security chiefs who did not alert him hours before the attack.

Documented responses

Reactions

16 latest responses. Dates: September 8, 2026 to September 10, 2026

1 response on this page

  1. United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Official foreign ministry of the United Arab EmiratesExplicitly stayed out

    Responding to

    Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu in late September 2023 that Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major Hamas operation that could cause bloodshed and destabilize the region.

    "The Ministry does not comment on media stories or speculation regarding conversations between government leaders."

    The UAE Foreign Ministry declined to confirm or deny the alleged conversation while describing established intelligence channels between the countries.

    Why we used this label

    The ministry expressly declined to address the reported leaders’ conversation; its general statement about intelligence channels is not a confirmation or denial.

    Before the statement

    Reporters sought an official UAE response after publication of the alleged call.

    After the statement

    No personal statement from Mohammed bin Zayed had been identified by the editorial cutoff.

Case timeline

25 timeline entries on this page. Dates: September 15, 2023 to September 10, 2026

  1. Reaction

    Haaretz rejects Netanyahu's demands and defends its reporting

    Haaretz published its response to Netanyahu's threatened libel lawsuit. Accessible reporting says it rejected removal, apology, and compensation demands. This is not confirmation that proceedings were filed or that the alleged warning occurred. The timestamp is the primary announcement's publication.

    Sources

  2. Reaction

    Anonymous intelligence source offers limited corroboration

    i24NEWS reported that an unnamed senior Middle East intelligence source told Ynet the UAE had warned Israel of possible significant and imminent Hamas action. The source did not verify a direct call to Netanyahu, identify the delivery channel, or establish what Netanyahu personally received.

    Sources

    i24NEWS reports PMO record-check denial and anonymous-source corroboration of a UAE warningSections on PMO record review and cited Ynet intelligence source
  3. Reaction

    Eldar says supporting documents and records exist

    In a CNN interview, Shlomi Eldar answered Netanyahu’s denial by saying he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence supporting the alleged call. The underlying materials were not made public in the segment.

    Sources

    CNN interview with Shlomi Eldar about the reported UAE warningThe Lead with Jake Tapper, segment beginning 18:45:32
  4. Reaction

    Officials and opposition leaders divide over the report

    Netanyahu’s office issued a categorical denial. Bennett said the report was true; Eisenkot, Golan, Bennett, and Liberman demanded an investigation. The UAE Foreign Ministry declined to confirm or deny the alleged leaders’ conversation.

    Sources

    Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — reportFull report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions
    UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs response to reporting about an alleged pre–October 7 warning - United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign AffairsOfficial X statement
    Opposition figures demand investigation over Oct. 7 revelationsJoint statement by Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Avigdor Liberman, and Yair Golan
  5. Source release

    Haaretz publishes the alleged UAE-warning account

    Haaretz published reporting by Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval alleging that MBZ warned Netanyahu and that Netanyahu did not brief senior security officials. The Times of Israel subsequently reported anonymous Emirati corroboration.

    Sources

    Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — reportFull report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions
  6. Incident

    Hamas-led forces attack southern Israel

    Hamas-led forces crossed from Gaza and attacked Israeli communities and military positions, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. The later dispute concerns advance warning and official responsibility, not the occurrence of the attack.

    Sources

    Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — reportFull report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions
  7. Incident

    Netanyahu–MBZ warning call allegedly occurs

    According to the originating report, Mohammed bin Zayed held a roughly 45-minute call with Netanyahu about ten days before October 7 and warned that Sinwar was preparing a major event. Netanyahu denies that the call or warning occurred.

    Sources

    Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — reportFull report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions
  8. Other

    Related warning information reportedly reaches Israeli intelligence

    Haaretz reports that a Fatah intermediary and an adviser to the UAE president conveyed related information to the Shin Bet in mid-September. Israeli officials reportedly discussed it but did not interpret it as warning of an imminent assault from Gaza.

    Sources

    Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — reportFull report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions

Full sources

Netanyahu got an explicit warning before Oct. 7. He didn’t brief security chiefsHaaretz

Reporting

Netanyahu got an explicit warning before Oct. 7. He didn’t brief security chiefs

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Investigation and book excerpt

Excerpt

"Netanyahu got an explicit warning before Oct. 7. He didn’t brief security chiefs."

About this source

Originating report drawn from the authors’ book and interviews. It reconstructs an alleged 45-minute call, but the call transcript, recording, call memorandum, and named on-record UAE confirmation are not publicly available.

Source details
Author
Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval
Published
Accessed
Dimitri Diliani rejects allegations that Dahlan engineered the Haaretz report

Interview

Dimitri Diliani rejects allegations that Dahlan engineered the Haaretz report

Excerpt

"ludicrous and misleading"

About this source

Direct statement to the Jerusalem Post by Fatah Reform Democratic faction spokesperson Dimitri Diliani. Publisher displays September 10 at 11:55 local time, updated 14:43. The underlying message time is unspecified; the position uses the publication date as a proxy with 12:00 UTC as a date-only placeholder.

Source details
Author
Danielle Greyman-Kennard
Published
Accessed
Anadolu reports Haaretz's rejection of Netanyahu's demands

Reporting

Anadolu reports Haaretz's rejection of Netanyahu's demands

Excerpt

"the product of an in-depth, well-sourced journalistic investigation into a matter of the utmost public interest."

About this source

Accessible secondary report quotes Haaretz and describes rejected removal, apology, and compensation demands. It establishes a response to a lawsuit threat, not that a suit has been filed or that the alleged warning occurred. Only the calendar date is established; 12:00 UTC is a date-only storage placeholder, not a verified time.

Source details
Author
Abderaouf Arnaout and Ikram Kouachi
Published
Accessed
Haaretz responds to Netanyahu's threatened libel lawsuitHaaretz

Official statement

Haaretz responds to Netanyahu's threatened libel lawsuit

Excerpt

"Won't Hesitate to Expose the Truth in Court"

About this source

Primary announcement by the outlet about its own legal response. The excerpt is the quotation fragment in its publicly visible headline, not a retrieved passage from the subscriber-only full letter. Publication displays 14:30 IDT. Supplementary Anadolu reporting supplies the demands and fuller context.

Source details
Author
Haaretz
Published
Accessed
Attempt to throw Netanyahu under the busMark Levin

Analysis

Attempt to throw Netanyahu under the bus

Excerpt

"Three anonymous foreign senior sources in a book released and promoted by Haaretz. Nothing more."

About this source

Signed opinion article by Mark Levin challenging the allegation’s sourcing and timing.

Source details
Author
Mark Levin
Published
Accessed
September 8, 2026 live updates: Opposition chiefs respond to alleged UAE warning

Reporting

September 8, 2026 live updates: Opposition chiefs respond to alleged UAE warning

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: 3:20 pm update

Excerpt

"The shocking revelations this morning demand an immediate and thorough investigation."

About this source

Records the joint opposition statement by Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Yair Golan, and Avigdor Liberman.

Source details
Published
Accessed
9/8/26 - Unraveling the Psyop: Netanyahu and the Media ManipulationMark Levin

Analysis

9/8/26 - Unraveling the Psyop: Netanyahu and the Media Manipulation

Excerpt

"This is a well-timed, well organized political ambush."

About this source

Direct podcast episode arguing that the report and ensuing coverage constitute an election-timed campaign against Netanyahu.

Source details
Author
Mark Levin
Published
Accessed
Bennett confirms Netanyahu was warned by UAE of Sinwar threat before Oct. 7

Reporting

Bennett confirms Netanyahu was warned by UAE of Sinwar threat before Oct. 7

Excerpt

"Yair Lapid similarly scrutinized Netanyahu’s failure to heed the warning."

About this source

Reports direct reactions by Yair Lapid, Chili Tropper, and Amit Becher to the alleged UAE warning.

Source details
Author
Goldie Katz
Published
Accessed
Netanyahu & 10/7; Houtis; Trade War; AI; Parenthood; PISA; Achievements

Analysis

Netanyahu & 10/7; Houtis; Trade War; AI; Parenthood; PISA; Achievements

Excerpt

"Netanyahu has to go regardless of how this specific allegation shakes out."

About this source

Podcast episode discussing the reported pre-October 7 UAE warning; the episode description presents Brook's conclusion as going beyond the allegation's ultimate resolution.

Source details
Author
Yaron Brook
Published
Accessed
Naftali Bennett says the report of a pre–October 7 UAE warning is true

Original post

Naftali Bennett says the report of a pre–October 7 UAE warning is true

Excerpt

"“The report published this morning that Netanyahu was warned 10 days before the October 7 massacre about Sinwar’s intentions is true.”"

About this source

Direct public statement by former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. Bennett does not publicly state the basis for his asserted knowledge or provide underlying records; it is evidence of his position, not independent public authentication of the reported call.

Source details
Published
Accessed
i24NEWS reports PMO record-check denial and anonymous-source corroboration of a UAE warning

Reporting

i24NEWS reports PMO record-check denial and anonymous-source corroboration of a UAE warning

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Sections on PMO record review and cited Ynet intelligence source

Excerpt

"The source declined to say whether the intelligence was transmitted in a direct phone call."

About this source

i24NEWS reports the PMO’s claim that call and entry records negate the alleged direct call. It also relays a senior, unnamed intelligence source’s claim to Ynet that the UAE gave Israel a warning of significant and imminent Hamas action. The unnamed source did not confirm a direct bin Zayed–Netanyahu call, the warning’s precise transmission route, or what Netanyahu personally received.

Source details
Published
Accessed
CNN interview with Shlomi Eldar about the reported UAE warning

Interview

CNN interview with Shlomi Eldar about the reported UAE warning

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: The Lead with Jake Tapper, segment beginning 18:45:32

Excerpt

"I have the document, I have records, I have everything that shows that the president of UAE called Netanyahu."

About this source

Direct interview in which Eldar answers the Prime Minister’s Office denial and says he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence. CNN published the transcript, but the underlying documents and records were not displayed or independently authenticated in the segment.

Source details
Author
CNN; interview by Jake Tapper
Published
Accessed
Opposition figures demand investigation over Oct. 7 revelations

Reporting

Opposition figures demand investigation over Oct. 7 revelations

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Joint statement by Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Avigdor Liberman, and Yair Golan

Excerpt

"What Netanyahu knew, when he knew it, why he did not inform the security establishment."

About this source

Report preserving a joint opposition demand for an immediate investigation. The signatories are political rivals of Netanyahu in an active election campaign.

Source details
Opposition figures demand investigation over Oct. 7 revelations (opens in a new tab)Joint statement by Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Avigdor Liberman, and Yair Golan
Author
Israel National News
Published
Accessed
Netanyahu announces planned libel lawsuit over Haaretz report claiming UAE warned of Oct. 7

Reporting

Netanyahu announces planned libel lawsuit over Haaretz report claiming UAE warned of Oct. 7

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full report and quoted Prime Minister’s Office statement

Excerpt

"The story was completely fabricated."

About this source

Reports Netanyahu’s renewed denial, claimed review of call and visitor records, planned libel action, blame directed toward security chiefs, and Haaretz’s statement that it stands by its report.

Source details
Author
Tzvi Jasper
Published
Accessed
UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs response to reporting about an alleged pre–October 7 warningUnited Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Original post

UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs response to reporting about an alleged pre–October 7 warning

Excerpt

"The Ministry does not comment on media stories or speculation regarding conversations between government leaders."

About this source

Official response that declines to confirm or deny the alleged call while stating that relevant intelligence is communicated through established channels.

Source details
Author
United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Published
Accessed
Naftali Bennett statement on the reported UAE warningNaftali Bennett

Original post

Naftali Bennett statement on the reported UAE warning

Excerpt

"The report published this morning that Netanyahu was warned ten days before the October 7 massacre is true."

About this source

Direct public statement asserting the report is true and condemning Netanyahu’s alleged handling. Bennett did not disclose the basis for saying he knew it was true.

Source details
Author
Naftali Bennett
Published
Accessed
UAE warned Netanyahu of major Hamas operation days before Oct. 7 attack, news report says

Reporting

UAE warned Netanyahu of major Hamas operation days before Oct. 7 attack, news report says

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full report

About this source

Independent synthesis of the Haaretz report, Netanyahu’s denial, the UAE response, and reactions from Israeli political opponents.

Source details
Author
Associated Press
Published
Accessed
Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — report

Reporting

Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — report

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions

Excerpt

"An Emirati source familiar with the conversation confirmed the Haaretz newspaper’s report."

About this source

Detailed secondary report reproducing the competing claims. Its Emirati corroboration is anonymous; the UAE government did not confirm or deny the alleged leaders’ conversation.

Source details
Author
Times of Israel Staff, Jacob Magid, and Stav Levaton
Published
Accessed

Accountability

Corrections and right to reply

Corrections address errors in our reporting or labels. When a speaker changes their position, we add a separate statement and link it to the earlier one.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Avigdor Lieberman

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

September 8, 2026 live updates: Opposition chiefs respond to alleged UAE warning (opens in a new tab)3:20 pm update

Records the joint opposition statement by Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Yair Golan, and Avigdor Liberman.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Haaretz

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks; Media.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the October 7 warning story together with alleged media misconduct, reporting pressure, libel, or the outlet's defense. Israeli election references are not U.S. 2026 Midterm Elections. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Haaretz responds to Netanyahu's threatened libel lawsuit (opens in a new tab) - Haaretz

Primary announcement by the outlet about its own legal response. The excerpt is the quotation fragment in its publicly visible headline, not a retrieved passage from the subscriber-only full letter. Publication displays 14:30 IDT. Supplementary Anadolu reporting supplies the demands and fuller context.

Anadolu reports Haaretz's rejection of Netanyahu's demands (opens in a new tab)

Accessible secondary report quotes Haaretz and describes rejected removal, apology, and compensation demands. It establishes a response to a lawsuit threat, not that a suit has been filed or that the alleged warning occurred. Only the calendar date is established; 12:00 UTC is a date-only storage placeholder, not a verified time.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Dimitri Diliani

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks; Media.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the October 7 warning story together with alleged media misconduct, reporting pressure, libel, or the outlet's defense. Israeli election references are not U.S. 2026 Midterm Elections. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Dimitri Diliani rejects allegations that Dahlan engineered the Haaretz report (opens in a new tab)

Direct statement to the Jerusalem Post by Fatah Reform Democratic faction spokesperson Dimitri Diliani. Publisher displays September 10 at 11:55 local time, updated 14:43. The underlying message time is unspecified; the position uses the publication date as a proxy with 12:00 UTC as a date-only placeholder.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Naftali Bennett

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Naftali Bennett says the report of a pre–October 7 UAE warning is true (opens in a new tab)Bennett X post

Direct public statement by former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. Bennett does not publicly state the basis for his asserted knowledge or provide underlying records; it is evidence of his position, not independent public authentication of the reported call.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Amit Becher

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Bennett confirms Netanyahu was warned by UAE of Sinwar threat before Oct. 7 (opens in a new tab)

Reports direct reactions by Yair Lapid, Chili Tropper, and Amit Becher to the alleged UAE warning.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Prime Minister’s Office of Israel

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Netanyahu announces planned libel lawsuit over Haaretz report claiming UAE warned of Oct. 7 (opens in a new tab)Full report and quoted Prime Minister’s Office statement

Reports Netanyahu’s renewed denial, claimed review of call and visitor records, planned libel action, blame directed toward security chiefs, and Haaretz’s statement that it stands by its report.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Mark Levin

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks; Media.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the October 7 warning story together with alleged media misconduct, reporting pressure, libel, or the outlet's defense. Israeli election references are not U.S. 2026 Midterm Elections. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

9/8/26 - Unraveling the Psyop: Netanyahu and the Media Manipulation (opens in a new tab) - Mark Levin

Direct podcast episode arguing that the report and ensuing coverage constitute an election-timed campaign against Netanyahu.

Attempt to throw Netanyahu under the bus (opens in a new tab) - Mark Levin

Signed opinion article by Mark Levin challenging the allegation’s sourcing and timing.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Shlomi Eldar

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

CNN interview with Shlomi Eldar about the reported UAE warning (opens in a new tab)The Lead with Jake Tapper, segment beginning 18:45:32

Direct interview in which Eldar answers the Prime Minister’s Office denial and says he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence. CNN published the transcript, but the underlying documents and records were not displayed or independently authenticated in the segment.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Yaron Brook

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Netanyahu & 10/7; Houtis; Trade War; AI; Parenthood; PISA; Achievements (opens in a new tab)

Podcast episode discussing the reported pre-October 7 UAE warning; the episode description presents Brook's conclusion as going beyond the allegation's ultimate resolution.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs response to reporting about an alleged pre–October 7 warning (opens in a new tab) - United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign AffairsOfficial X statement

Official response that declines to confirm or deny the alleged call while stating that relevant intelligence is communicated through established channels.

Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — report (opens in a new tab)Full report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions

Detailed secondary report reproducing the competing claims. Its Emirati corroboration is anonymous; the UAE government did not confirm or deny the alleged leaders’ conversation.

UAE warned Netanyahu of major Hamas operation days before Oct. 7 attack, news report says (opens in a new tab)Full report

Independent synthesis of the Haaretz report, Netanyahu’s denial, the UAE response, and reactions from Israeli political opponents.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Naftali Bennett

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Naftali Bennett statement on the reported UAE warning (opens in a new tab) - Naftali BennettX post

Direct public statement asserting the report is true and condemning Netanyahu’s alleged handling. Bennett did not disclose the basis for saying he knew it was true.

Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — report (opens in a new tab)Full report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions

Detailed secondary report reproducing the competing claims. Its Emirati corroboration is anonymous; the UAE government did not confirm or deny the alleged leaders’ conversation.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Gadi Eisenkot

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — report (opens in a new tab)Full report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions

Detailed secondary report reproducing the competing claims. Its Emirati corroboration is anonymous; the UAE government did not confirm or deny the alleged leaders’ conversation.

Opposition figures demand investigation over Oct. 7 revelations (opens in a new tab)Joint statement by Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Avigdor Liberman, and Yair Golan

Report preserving a joint opposition demand for an immediate investigation. The signatories are political rivals of Netanyahu in an active election campaign.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Benjamin Netanyahu

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks; Media.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the October 7 warning story together with alleged media misconduct, reporting pressure, libel, or the outlet's defense. Israeli election references are not U.S. 2026 Midterm Elections. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Netanyahu announces planned libel lawsuit over Haaretz report claiming UAE warned of Oct. 7 (opens in a new tab)Full report and quoted Prime Minister’s Office statement

Reports Netanyahu’s renewed denial, claimed review of call and visitor records, planned libel action, blame directed toward security chiefs, and Haaretz’s statement that it stands by its report.

Reporting correction

Correction to: Statement by Yair Golan

Previous language
Topic associations: October 7 Intelligence and Government Accountability; Israel and Zionism; Political Rhetoric and Violence.
Corrected language
Topic associations: Israel; October 7 Attacks.

Topic taxonomy maintenance only. Addresses the specific warning, evidence, official response, or responsibility for October 7; no broad Political Violence tag is needed for a record/credibility dispute alone. The quotation, attribution, stance classification, sources, and dates are unchanged.

This corrects our account of what happened.

Days before Oct. 7, UAE leader warned Netanyahu Hamas was planning war, but PM did nothing with info — report (opens in a new tab)Full report; sections on alleged call, official responses, and opposition reactions

Detailed secondary report reproducing the competing claims. Its Emirati corroboration is anonymous; the UAE government did not confirm or deny the alleged leaders’ conversation.

Opposition figures demand investigation over Oct. 7 revelations (opens in a new tab)Joint statement by Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Avigdor Liberman, and Yair Golan

Report preserving a joint opposition demand for an immediate investigation. The signatories are political rivals of Netanyahu in an active election campaign.

Optional assessment

The claim

Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu in late September 2023 that Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major Hamas operation that could cause bloodshed and destabilize the region.

Review the excerpt
Netanyahu got an explicit warning before Oct. 7. He didn’t brief security chiefs.

Location in the source: Investigation and book excerpt

Read the source entry
How strongly does the evidence shown support this claim?

Based on the case you read.