Andreas Kirsch on Artificial Intelligence

Statements and actions by Andreas Kirsch on this topic.

Public disputes concerning artificial intelligence, including its development, uses, safety, governance, effects on creative work, and role in research.

How we classify topics

Condemned0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Defended or excused0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Challenged the characterization0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Minimized0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Mixed or conditional1Statements: September 8, 2026. Selected filter. Activate to remove.Explicitly stayed out0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.

Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.

By category Timeline

Statement history

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 matching statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

1 published statement. Dates: September 8, 2026

Andreas Kirsch
Role at the time: Personal public response
September 8, 2026Mixed or conditional
Responding to
Bubeck says the disputed authorship proposal concerned a rewrite of OpenAI's proof, not removing Alpöge from his own work.
"The whole thing is def very messy"
Why we used this label
Qualified acceptance of the explanation without declaring the whole dispute resolved.
Andreas Kirsch gives a qualified response to Bubeck's account (opens in a new tab)

Says the account fits his expectations, calls the situation messy and qualifies congratulations on the results checking out.

Read statement Did OpenAI improperly pressure mathematicians over authorship and credit?